From patchwork Fri Jun 17 19:05:09 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bob Beckett X-Patchwork-Id: 12885894 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B26C433EF for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D2410F32F; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D996010F1A5; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes-devbox.fritz.box (82-71-8-225.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.71.8.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbeckett) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D90666017FA; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:05:42 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1655492742; bh=8vOVoJXWNBNoAe7uHxF6kK6AtRixKpYtIjs6ocUktn4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GPTBn8NOGqnuUZcxrYuvmdiXrILvdzQYT9WQLvHPfa0X/+sokBAfL1UlCZFzFsiKM aiT+fl7fyAbSYHinJ0wjc9QdskgUbkBRfcgOCI9nujh5TLviWQov79tPoQJ8zFmA8z y/UWiwNg1SH7vBnn/TK+ez48JzKw+El5HueSMO6h6b7PIayMiwAZlSBVfGQDeODYfA 2iH8bzoYwYTlQ9o1ER5Mbajbu/Gp8bXKkzTd4yXGuPjVi/wtZJNXyIY1rdkaRusi+m LJ/1FmwS5GMVREwBccCqk2H3YDNrcv+MwUF81JEdYaT6DNjxZIGYaq2ibDuOjczU5N IF06SlMgd97ng== From: Robert Beckett To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 19:05:09 +0000 Message-Id: <20220617190516.2805572-4-bob.beckett@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220617190516.2805572-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> References: <20220617190516.2805572-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 03/10] drm/i915/ttm: only trust snooping for dgfx when deciding default cache_level X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , kernel@collabora.com, Matthew Auld , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" By default i915_ttm_cache_level() decides I915_CACHE_LLC if HAS_SNOOP. This is divergent from existing backends code which only considers HAS_LLC. Testing shows that trusting snooping on gen5- is unreliable and bsw via ggtt mappings, so limit DGFX for now and maintain previous behaviour. Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c index 4c1de0b4a10f..40249fa28a7a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ static enum i915_cache_level i915_ttm_cache_level(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct ttm_resource *res, struct ttm_tt *ttm) { - return ((HAS_LLC(i915) || HAS_SNOOP(i915)) && + bool can_snoop = HAS_SNOOP(i915) && IS_DGFX(i915); + + return ((HAS_LLC(i915) || can_snoop) && !i915_ttm_gtt_binds_lmem(res) && ttm->caching == ttm_cached) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;