From patchwork Tue Jun 21 10:44:27 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthew Auld X-Patchwork-Id: 12889014 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06861C433EF for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5E110FAF6; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C6710FAF6; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:46:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1655808404; x=1687344404; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n5ckTRTLP9wiuuQK9cU4jhKq2TqebvscpQ2sbm9TNY8=; b=ON4k2LAnZiTSB+gsgpuk/DBYC4yOHMqcFnOz+IrJG+6xIQms3UqMInNW iYdOsqVPN5u3jmFGhqOec8hW81zCL1q7ZokdDHd5GF9yC6HbsgB/pHPBf YD/xq9D0oVE/ARufMsQc47D7T/FIcohI/rLud61FmcbvkbXq4B9jshdjl GpuPYn+7+0a1ZEHDF97OBl5knCoopDqUHnmxLtM70Y3M41t2IKjlWORBJ HUSvwmpuvZwUmq43+e7Tq78R1ed61QRBF4I3xyP6KpMI+XrB20DWYU/6S eA+kh12uVjt2g1RwBS3DvcdZKTO1fJssMCpXHgzLOFyrB46/5OanAR/nu g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10384"; a="263121939" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,209,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="263121939" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2022 03:46:44 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,209,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="562327086" Received: from jasonmor-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO mwauld-desk1.intel.com) ([10.213.200.10]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2022 03:46:42 -0700 From: Matthew Auld To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:44:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20220621104434.190962-6-matthew.auld@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220621104434.190962-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> References: <20220621104434.190962-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/uapi: apply ALLOC_GPU_ONLY by default X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Daniel Vetter , Kenneth Graunke , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On small BAR configurations, when dealing with I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE allocations, we assume that by default, all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-CPU visible portion. Note that dumb buffers are not included here, since these are not "GPU accelerated" and likely need CPU access. We choose to just always set GPU_ONLY, and let the backend figure out if that should be ignored or not, for example on full BAR systems. In a later patch userspace will be able to provide a hint if CPU access to the buffer is needed. v2(Thomas) - Apply GPU_ONLY on all discrete devices, but only if the BO can be placed in LMEM. Down in the depths this should be turned into a noop, where required, and as an annotation it still make some sense. If we apply it regardless of the placements then we end up needing to check the placements during exec capture. Also it's slightly inconsistent since the NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS can only be applied on objects that can be placed in LMEM. The other annoyance would be gem_create_ext vs plain gem_create, if we were to always apply GPU_ONLY. Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-sanity-check Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-big Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld Cc: Thomas Hellström Cc: Lionel Landwerlin Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Jon Bloomfield Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jordan Justen Cc: Kenneth Graunke Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c index 5802692ea604..d094cae0ddf1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c @@ -427,6 +427,14 @@ i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, ext_data.n_placements = 1; } + /* + * TODO: add a userspace hint to force CPU_ACCESS for the object, which + * can override this. + */ + if (ext_data.n_placements > 1 || + ext_data.placements[0]->type != INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM) + ext_data.flags |= I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY; + obj = __i915_gem_object_create_user_ext(i915, args->size, ext_data.placements, ext_data.n_placements,