From patchwork Wed Jul 13 13:50:15 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bob Beckett X-Patchwork-Id: 12916759 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C8DC433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B089AC62; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DB689AC62; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes-devbox.fritz.box (82-71-8-225.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.71.8.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbeckett) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7469D6601A38; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:50:41 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1657720241; bh=MULA0VYW5/ZsE36/5dPbAjqG53dPkqcAhW75h7Y1TfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JTFfNaDU7FfT14/gIP2iieKeArmXXf47HWVJQQJMYtPtRV478blFtL0Sj7aKfOZ8n cPSpr1c2/V/8gjQEpZSvW4R1DErWfyMRZuf+eF67I5OVPTxQMOctPhNxLN5Lq2Cdye 3eJC9A4y2wb65TG7I9yvmd7uV6RAC+DIjBS2FymWMce9TYiJjIHzUy9K1Mg7YS7NXf yvBkLeDXccpfcmq/u6UK5wNIeJQXekul42lYYr1753J+Wb2W0z0TggRThJUrkPcGE3 d/4zLDszgrXLvClgIKFxKGiMBnW/0UWh3aAWkq60lAXywAoNbOPLaYB9sP4ozOalAK b09pXqKNfYKbw== From: Robert Beckett To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:50:15 +0100 Message-Id: <20220713135022.3710682-4-bob.beckett@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220713135022.3710682-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> References: <20220713135022.3710682-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 03/10] drm/i915/ttm: only trust snooping for dgfx when deciding default cache_level X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , kernel@collabora.com, Matthew Auld , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" By default i915_ttm_cache_level() decides I915_CACHE_LLC if HAS_SNOOP. This is divergent from existing backends code which only considers HAS_LLC. Testing shows that trusting snooping on gen5- is unreliable and bsw via ggtt mappings, so limit DGFX for now and maintain previous behaviour. Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c index 042c2237e287..a949594237d9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c @@ -52,7 +52,9 @@ static enum i915_cache_level i915_ttm_cache_level(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct ttm_resource *res, struct ttm_tt *ttm) { - return ((HAS_LLC(i915) || HAS_SNOOP(i915)) && + bool can_snoop = HAS_SNOOP(i915) && IS_DGFX(i915); + + return ((HAS_LLC(i915) || can_snoop) && !i915_ttm_gtt_binds_lmem(res) && ttm->caching == ttm_cached) ? I915_CACHE_LLC : I915_CACHE_NONE;