From patchwork Wed Jan 11 15:41:03 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 13096870 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0307C678D6 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA4310E76C; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3040210E767 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id o15so11377780wmr.4 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:41:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=94eajVQl3EIphKCpXXhL7CnxhOfjsXCJp+mdLyrDZk0=; b=f7KHQ8uU7yo7cC1q+hRAYyai9jdEOJCO8tU1UcHPeDOQzr3zT9mcNDiHKbkAh9YMdi PcqaMKKeizVMG9LtdqmhoiqGGOE/2lkXWI8gQheuKM7IeiU6H+0SevQsiVwVjpCuYqMs pIc2/KEnN2fQGSipr275BOLjvkdqRmvXH0z6A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=94eajVQl3EIphKCpXXhL7CnxhOfjsXCJp+mdLyrDZk0=; b=fd0xzBZ/IytxC0CaBl2wQFs40XPfMithfC6qmtIQ+dwoZgILPaBUeZOCwlBKYjB2F7 XCEV7kCMWumKJRgZi6UCPo+naVtUzVhCeZ4LYUnhTiz4WtLlcUe9Mk7DXlDUJRfpuPr2 OslBct2n0MCjhgxpQb54zXn11RPwxCokCaYqD481SOqs7fMUvyrDhOQ6UDROdM03B3pg jU8Fg2SXg7eMZJ57mqikzMlC6vn9S72CTd2kIj+s6DziczAubAFBRJXpYl08dLSMe+VH L/YCLKNVSVHdqTWRkdTEcKdBFA/4K39MrrrmTrs0jfdVywFrF+4EnDdMULvblf2GhsPY qzJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kp95JZ5yLLKokjdGQGAdQmi0XqkMxTC3yOowbv4zpCJ115i0qvo lAqorpGRDWplBR7m/jQC4DS/CI+qEid+gM1G X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtf8JLpJynpq+UdfDiN+hQzDfbaEU0ALxQMv3+e3jXFqbhaPY9flDL5OZP4Gg/LNzzywZZOJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e4f:b0:3cf:9d32:db67 with SMTP id e15-20020a05600c4e4f00b003cf9d32db67mr52259243wmq.3.1673451682597; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9-20020a05600c198900b003d9e74dd9b2sm15936149wmq.9.2023.01.11.07.41.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:41:21 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:41:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20230111154112.90575-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0 In-Reply-To: <20230111154112.90575-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20230111154112.90575-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development , LKML , Daniel Vetter Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" This one nukes all framebuffers, which is a bit much. In reality gma500 is igpu and never shipped with anything discrete, so there should not be any difference. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c index cd9c73f5a64a..9b0daf90dc50 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int psb_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) * TODO: Refactor psb_driver_load() to map vdc_reg earlier. Then we * might be able to read the framebuffer range from the device. */ - ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(true, &driver); + ret = drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(pdev, &driver); if (ret) return ret;