From patchwork Wed Mar 8 13:28:46 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yi Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13165804 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4273DC74A44 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 13:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533EE10E5FC; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 13:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9598710E5E4; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 13:29:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1678282159; x=1709818159; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jI5t7+FTFbWU3k6ZtsKZ2cB5vkHyHBAEw/BOV4eh+Oo=; b=ZRiBAoneBqhCfwPUItxQqJ0aDEYAawI9b20HGPasrRj4pzLN37zhxZ8v KmcuUAr+W7LRZ1Kg3PsScCR25oOq0RbEEzJTZzWztECJDwTcDToE/UcnJ 0ElDCOMJ4Nqg20fjT9xgZSVkTrrWG4dkhadyG3sptFpWeeb/+ffcrcO0c l+LHkmzyL8dy1pGoJ5G3HAr2gufiHdovqVORlCVSlgNG4+7LPsQM1pIns vjG7yZ1b/WzijTG/af6MeqnZyCSvclhfLnI/APPLlUXqM5brzkUzPMwOi 4DEdgVmiuYVtZfbBQQ+Z3lWxMZPpDZyVjTxiGReNubb3k9llCjus/fyQ5 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10642"; a="336165170" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,244,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="336165170" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Mar 2023 05:29:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10642"; a="922789325" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,244,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="922789325" Received: from 984fee00a4c6.jf.intel.com ([10.165.58.231]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2023 05:29:18 -0800 From: Yi Liu To: alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 05:28:46 -0800 Message-Id: <20230308132903.465159-8-yi.l.liu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230308132903.465159-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com> References: <20230308132903.465159-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 07/24] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, yi.l.liu@intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, joro@8bytes.org, cohuck@redhat.com, xudong.hao@intel.com, peterx@redhat.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, terrence.xu@intel.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, lulu@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, jasowang@redhat.com Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Allow the vfio_device file to be in a state where the device FD is opened but the device cannot be used by userspace (i.e. its .open_device() hasn't been called). This inbetween state is not used when the device FD is spawned from the group FD, however when we create the device FD directly by opening a cdev it will be opened in the blocked state. The reason for the inbetween state is that userspace only gets a FD but doesn't gain access permission until binding the FD to an iommufd. So in the blocked state, only the bind operation is allowed. Completing bind will allow user to further access the device. This is implemented by adding a flag in struct vfio_device_file to mark the blocked state and using a simple smp_load_acquire() to obtain the flag value and serialize all the device setup with the thread accessing this device. Following this lockless scheme, it can safely handle the device FD unbound->bound but it cannot handle bound->unbound. To allow this we'd need to add a lock on all the vfio ioctls which seems costly. So once device FD is bound, it remains bound until the FD is closed. Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: Yi Liu Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Tested-by: Terrence Xu Tested-by: Nicolin Chen Tested-by: Matthew Rosato --- drivers/vfio/group.c | 11 ++++++++++- drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 1 + drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c index 160a4c891dda..4a220d5bf79b 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c @@ -194,9 +194,18 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df) df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd; ret = vfio_device_open(df); - if (ret) + if (ret) { df->iommufd = NULL; + goto out_put_kvm; + } + + /* + * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/ + * read/write/mmap + */ + smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true); +out_put_kvm: if (device->open_count == 0) vfio_device_put_kvm(device); diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h index 7ced404526d9..e60c409868f8 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct vfio_container; struct vfio_device_file { struct vfio_device *device; + bool access_granted; spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */ struct kvm *kvm; struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */ diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c index 8c9b05f540fd..027410e8d4a8 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c @@ -1114,6 +1114,10 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep, struct vfio_device *device = df->device; int ret; + /* Paired with smp_store_release() in vfio_device_group_open() */ + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) + return -EINVAL; + ret = vfio_device_pm_runtime_get(device); if (ret) return ret; @@ -1141,6 +1145,10 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf, struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data; struct vfio_device *device = df->device; + /* Paired with smp_store_release() in vfio_device_group_open() */ + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) + return -EINVAL; + if (unlikely(!device->ops->read)) return -EINVAL; @@ -1154,6 +1162,10 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_write(struct file *filep, struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data; struct vfio_device *device = df->device; + /* Paired with smp_store_release() in vfio_device_group_open() */ + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) + return -EINVAL; + if (unlikely(!device->ops->write)) return -EINVAL; @@ -1165,6 +1177,10 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma) struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data; struct vfio_device *device = df->device; + /* Paired with smp_store_release() in vfio_device_group_open() */ + if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted)) + return -EINVAL; + if (unlikely(!device->ops->mmap)) return -EINVAL;