@@ -814,12 +814,8 @@ static void __igt_kunit(const char *module_name, const char *opts)
if (READ_ONCE(results->head) != NULL) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&results->mutex);
- igt_dynamic(results->head->test_name) {
- if (READ_ONCE(results->head->passed))
- igt_success();
- else
- igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_FAILURE);
- }
+ igt_dynamic(results->head->test_name)
+ igt_assert(READ_ONCE(results->head->passed));
temp = results->head;
results->head = results->head->next;
@@ -834,8 +830,7 @@ unload:
igt_ktest_fini(&tst);
- if (skip)
- igt_skip("Skipping test, as probing KUnit module returned %d", skip);
+ igt_skip_on_f(skip, "Skipping test, as probing KUnit module failed\n");
if (fail)
igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_ABORT);
@@ -844,9 +839,6 @@ unload:
if (ret != 0)
igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_ABORT);
-
- if (ret == 0)
- igt_success();
}
void igt_kunit(const char *module_name, const char *name, const char *opts)
Calling igt_success() explicitly at the end of subtest body is not needed. Other calls to igt_success() can be usually avoided by inverting test result checks. Optimize the code that now calls igt_success(). Moreover, using more advanced variants of igt_skip() and igt_fail() where applicable makes the code more compact. Go for it. Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> --- lib/igt_kmod.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)