Message ID | 20240925034432.1777029-3-arun.r.murthy@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Some correction in the DP Link Training sequence | expand |
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote: > Figure 3-52: 128b132b DP DPTC LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE Sequence of > DP2.1a spec. > After reading LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE, read the FFE presets. > AUX_RD_INTERVAL and then write the new FFE presets. Nope. That's just not what the figure has. > Co-developed-by: Srikanth V NagaVenkata <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > --- > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > index f41b69840ad9..1bac00e46533 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > @@ -1419,12 +1419,6 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { > fsleep(delay_us); > > - /* > - * The delay may get updated. The transmitter shall read the > - * delay before link status during link training. > - */ > - delay_us = drm_dp_128b132b_read_aux_rd_interval(&intel_dp->aux); > - > if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(&intel_dp->aux, link_status) < 0) { > lt_err(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX, "Failed to read link status\n"); > return false; > @@ -1451,8 +1445,14 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > if (time_after(jiffies, deadline)) > timeout = true; /* try one last time after deadline */ > > - /* Update signal levels and training set as requested. */ > intel_dp_get_adjust_train(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX, link_status); > + /* > + * During LT, Tx shall read AUX_RD_INTERVAL just before writing the new FFE > + * presets. > + */ > + delay_us = drm_dp_128b132b_read_aux_rd_interval(&intel_dp->aux); I said this should be put *above* intel_dp_get_adjust_train(), and you agreed. There was even a patch to that effect, and that's what I thought we were going by. It's both logical and per spec to keep the TX FFE PRESET read and write together, and AUX RD INTERVAL read *before* them. Where does the spec say, "read AUX_RD_INTERVAL just before writing the new FFE presets"? I don't think it does. The box in figure 3-52 has: - Read AUX_RD_INTERVAL value - Adjust the TX_FFE_PRESET_VALUE setting as requested by a DPRX/LTTPR_UFP The "as requested by" part involves reading TX FFE PRESET to know what the DPRX requested. I don't see anything wrong in the original comment, just the placement of the read. There have been a multitude of different patches with random version numbers with no changelog and I don't even know what I'm supposed to be reviewing anymore. BR, Jani. > + > + /* Update signal levels and training set as requested. */ > if (!intel_dp_update_link_train(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX)) { > lt_err(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX, "Failed to update TX FFE settings\n"); > return false;
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 2:18 PM > To: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Murthy, Arun R <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>; Srikanth V, NagaVenkata > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com>; Kandpal, Suraj > <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/3] drm/i915/dp: read Aux RD interval just before > setting the FFE preset > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2024, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote: > > Figure 3-52: 128b132b DP DPTC LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE Sequence of > DP2.1a > > spec. > > After reading LANEx_CHANNEL_EQ_DONE, read the FFE presets. > > AUX_RD_INTERVAL and then write the new FFE presets. > > Nope. That's just not what the figure has. > > > Co-developed-by: Srikanth V NagaVenkata > > <nagavenkata.srikanth.v@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > > --- > > .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 14 > > +++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > index f41b69840ad9..1bac00e46533 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c > > @@ -1419,12 +1419,6 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp > *intel_dp, > > for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { > > fsleep(delay_us); > > > > - /* > > - * The delay may get updated. The transmitter shall read the > > - * delay before link status during link training. > > - */ > > - delay_us = > drm_dp_128b132b_read_aux_rd_interval(&intel_dp->aux); > > - > > if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(&intel_dp->aux, link_status) > < 0) { > > lt_err(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX, "Failed to read link > status\n"); > > return false; > > @@ -1451,8 +1445,14 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp > *intel_dp, > > if (time_after(jiffies, deadline)) > > timeout = true; /* try one last time after deadline */ > > > > - /* Update signal levels and training set as requested. */ > > intel_dp_get_adjust_train(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX, > > link_status); > > + /* > > + * During LT, Tx shall read AUX_RD_INTERVAL just before > writing the new FFE > > + * presets. > > + */ > > + delay_us = > drm_dp_128b132b_read_aux_rd_interval(&intel_dp->aux); > > I said this should be put *above* intel_dp_get_adjust_train(), and you agreed. > There was even a patch to that effect, and that's what I thought we were going > by. > Yes I had pushed a patch also, but later based on Suraj comment pointing to the spec changed this. I am not able to find that again in spec. > It's both logical and per spec to keep the TX FFE PRESET read and write > together, and AUX RD INTERVAL read *before* them. > Yes agree! > Where does the spec say, "read AUX_RD_INTERVAL just before writing the new > FFE presets"? I don't think it does. > > The box in figure 3-52 has: > > - Read AUX_RD_INTERVAL value > > - Adjust the TX_FFE_PRESET_VALUE setting as requested by a > DPRX/LTTPR_UFP > > The "as requested by" part involves reading TX FFE PRESET to know what the > DPRX requested. > Yes, but I now see a different thing now " During LT, the transmitter shall read DPCD 02216h before DPCD 00202h through 00207h, and 0200Ch through 0200Fh. If DPCD 00204h[0] = 0 and DPCD 0200Eh[0] = 0, the transmitter shall adjust the drive setting according to the receiver's request, and then write the new setting to DPCD 00103h through 00106h and re-initiate the receiver counter" Ref: 3.5.2.16.1.1 of spec DP2.1 Here it says read AUX_RD_INTERVAL before reading the lane states(0x0202, 0x0203) reading the FFE presets(0x0206, 0x0207), which is what our original code was doing. > I don't see anything wrong in the original comment, just the placement of the > read. > > There have been a multitude of different patches with random version numbers > with no changelog and I don't even know what I'm supposed to be reviewing > anymore. > Sorry for that! Thanks and Regards, Arun R Murthy --------------------
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c index f41b69840ad9..1bac00e46533 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c @@ -1419,12 +1419,6 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, for (try = 0; try < max_tries; try++) { fsleep(delay_us); - /* - * The delay may get updated. The transmitter shall read the - * delay before link status during link training. - */ - delay_us = drm_dp_128b132b_read_aux_rd_interval(&intel_dp->aux); - if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_link_status(&intel_dp->aux, link_status) < 0) { lt_err(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX, "Failed to read link status\n"); return false; @@ -1451,8 +1445,14 @@ intel_dp_128b132b_lane_eq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, if (time_after(jiffies, deadline)) timeout = true; /* try one last time after deadline */ - /* Update signal levels and training set as requested. */ intel_dp_get_adjust_train(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX, link_status); + /* + * During LT, Tx shall read AUX_RD_INTERVAL just before writing the new FFE + * presets. + */ + delay_us = drm_dp_128b132b_read_aux_rd_interval(&intel_dp->aux); + + /* Update signal levels and training set as requested. */ if (!intel_dp_update_link_train(intel_dp, crtc_state, DP_PHY_DPRX)) { lt_err(intel_dp, DP_PHY_DPRX, "Failed to update TX FFE settings\n"); return false;