diff mbox series

[3/9] drm/i915/pfit: Reject pfit downscaling for GMCH platforms

Message ID 20241016143134.26903-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/i915/pfit: Panel fitter stuff | expand

Commit Message

Ville Syrjälä Oct. 16, 2024, 2:31 p.m. UTC
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Gen2/3 pfit doesn't support downscaling at all, so reject it.

On i965+ downscaling is supported by the hardware (max scale
factor < 2.0), but as downscaling increases the effective
pixel rate we can't safely allow it unless
intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate() gets fixed. Probably the
best solution would be to calculate (at least an
apporiximate) pfit destination window and use
ilk_pipe_pixel_rate() for all platforms. For now reject
downscaling on all gmch platforms.

The intel ddx has a similar check for this in userspace,
modesetting ddx does not. And presumably wayland compositors
also do not make such assumptions in userspace.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

Comments

Jani Nikula Oct. 22, 2024, 8:25 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Gen2/3 pfit doesn't support downscaling at all, so reject it.
>
> On i965+ downscaling is supported by the hardware (max scale
> factor < 2.0), but as downscaling increases the effective
> pixel rate we can't safely allow it unless
> intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate() gets fixed. Probably the
> best solution would be to calculate (at least an
> apporiximate) pfit destination window and use
> ilk_pipe_pixel_rate() for all platforms. For now reject
> downscaling on all gmch platforms.
>
> The intel ddx has a similar check for this in userspace,
> modesetting ddx does not. And presumably wayland compositors
> also do not make such assumptions in userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> index fb7def772376..89cac3b3fd02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,7 @@ static void i9xx_scale_aspect(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  static int gmch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			      const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
>  {
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	u32 pfit_control = 0, pfit_pgm_ratios = 0, border = 0;
> @@ -693,6 +694,25 @@ static int gmch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	    adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay == pipe_src_h)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: implement downscaling for i965+. Need to account
> +	 * for downscaling in intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate().
> +	 */
> +	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay < pipe_src_w) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> +			    "[CRTC:%d:%s] pfit horizontal downscaling (%d->%d) not supported\n",
> +			    crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
> +			    pipe_src_w, adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay < pipe_src_h) {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> +			    "[CRTC:%d:%s] pfit vertical downscaling (%d->%d) not supported\n",
> +			    crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
> +			    pipe_src_h, adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	switch (conn_state->scaling_mode) {
>  	case DRM_MODE_SCALE_CENTER:
>  		/*
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
index fb7def772376..89cac3b3fd02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
@@ -681,6 +681,7 @@  static void i9xx_scale_aspect(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 static int gmch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 			      const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
 {
+	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
 	u32 pfit_control = 0, pfit_pgm_ratios = 0, border = 0;
@@ -693,6 +694,25 @@  static int gmch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	    adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay == pipe_src_h)
 		goto out;
 
+	/*
+	 * TODO: implement downscaling for i965+. Need to account
+	 * for downscaling in intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate().
+	 */
+	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay < pipe_src_w) {
+		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
+			    "[CRTC:%d:%s] pfit horizontal downscaling (%d->%d) not supported\n",
+			    crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
+			    pipe_src_w, adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay < pipe_src_h) {
+		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
+			    "[CRTC:%d:%s] pfit vertical downscaling (%d->%d) not supported\n",
+			    crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
+			    pipe_src_h, adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	switch (conn_state->scaling_mode) {
 	case DRM_MODE_SCALE_CENTER:
 		/*