From patchwork Mon May 9 21:47:58 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reinette Chatre X-Patchwork-Id: 12844087 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644B9C433FE for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 21:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229826AbiEIVxd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 17:53:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230510AbiEIVwP (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 17:52:15 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EAFD2725C0 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 14:48:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1652132893; x=1683668893; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=X+/sST7Rol6uN7QE8JK0o51uFMcRr+R68PnOlW6duH0=; b=AjIt9QHBVLnf0Yyd2nvy7V8wkN34r6cIxKIgu2z8475kliHgk/yvEUh/ Kfb2NdQvrLPhRFHlss0PbcAI+DbpY16KUZA9ZDptTr/m5IzvUSBg/GvC2 lkEycs4DBg1frb/SPSj53vgEOj7guspXGlkc+ZzSqZW+XbUBzWOoijGep YicQk4MwQKImWQyucl3slk1rDQws7BZXwk/5ZuW53zOdtd+0muXJCQAjH zEbo+mbAyU7LQu4rzLw3EnXlrW8LbRt3TLnagsiuAXuM954oxn/z8n6ih if6yocDTol0ZjeDdSZrHR/29Ng4LNfYqzC8BKEd4YDEcqjePe2s5UTHyw g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10342"; a="332212851" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,212,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="332212851" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2022 14:48:08 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,212,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="565293487" Received: from rchatre-ws.ostc.intel.com ([10.54.69.144]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2022 14:48:08 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org Cc: haitao.huang@intel.com Subject: [PATCH V2 0/5] SGX shmem backing store issue Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 14:47:58 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org First version of series was submitted with incomplete fixes as RFC V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/cover.1651171455.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com/ Changes since RFC V1: - Remaining issue was root-caused with debugging help from Dave. Patch 4/5 is new and eliminates all occurences of the ENCLS[ELDU] related WARN. - Drop "x86/sgx: Do not free backing memory on ENCLS[ELDU] failure" from series. ENCLS[ELDU] failure is not recoverable so it serves no purpose to keep the backing memory that could not be restored to the enclave. - Patch 1/5 is new and refactors sgx_encl_put_backing() to only put references to pages and not also mark the pages as dirty. (Dave) - Mark PCMD page dirty before (not after) writing data to it. (Dave) - Patch 5/5 is new and adds debug code to WARN if PCMD page is ever found to contain data after it is truncated. (Dave) Hi Everybody, Haitao reported encountering the following WARN while stress testing SGX with the SGX2 series [1] applied: ELDU returned 1073741837 (0x4000000d) WARNING: CPU: 72 PID: 24407 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c:81 sgx_encl_eldu+0x3cf/0x400 ... Call Trace: ? xa_load+0x6e/0xa0 __sgx_encl_load_page+0x3d/0x80 sgx_encl_load_page_in_vma+0x4a/0x60 sgx_vma_fault+0x7f/0x3b0 ? sysvec_call_function_single+0x66/0xd0 ? asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x12/0x20 __do_fault+0x39/0x110 __handle_mm_fault+0x1222/0x15a0 handle_mm_fault+0xdb/0x2c0 do_user_addr_fault+0x1d1/0x650 ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x45/0x170 exc_page_fault+0x76/0x170 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 ... ENCLS[ELDU] is returning a #GP when attempting to load an enclave page from the backing store into the enclave. Haitao's stress testing involves running two concurrent loops of the SGX2 selftests on a system with 4GB EPC memory. One of the tests is modified to reduce the oversubscription heap size: I learned the following during investigation of the issue: * Reverting commit 08999b2489b4 ("x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave page") resolves the issue. With that commit reverted the concurrent selftest loops can run to completion without encountering any WARNs. * The issue is also resolved if only the calls (introduced by commit 08999b2489b4 ("x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave page") ) to sgx_encl_truncate_backing_page() within __sgx_encl_eldu() are disabled. * ENCLS[ELDU] faults with #GP when the provided PCMD data is all zeroes. The fixes in this series address scenarios where the PCMD data in the backing store may not be correct. There are no occurences of the WARN when the stress testing is performed with this series applied. Thank you very much Reinette [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1649878359.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com/ Reinette Chatre (5): x86/sgx: Disconnect backing page references from dirty status x86/sgx: Mark PCMD page as dirty when modifying contents x86/sgx: Obtain backing storage page with enclave mutex held x86/sgx: Fix race between reclaimer and page fault handler x86/sgx: Ensure no data in PCMD page after truncate arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 13 ++-- 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) base-commit: 672c0c5173427e6b3e2a9bbb7be51ceeec78093a Tested-by: Haitao Huang diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c index d480c2dd2858..12008789325b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.c @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(enclave, unclobbered_vdso_oversubscribed_remove, 900) * Create enclave with additional heap that is as big as all * available physical SGX memory. */ - total_mem = get_total_epc_mem(); + total_mem = get_total_epc_mem()/16; ASSERT_NE(total_mem, 0); TH_LOG("Creating an enclave with %lu bytes heap may take a while ...", total_mem); If the the test compiled with above snippet is renamed as "test_sgx_small" and the original renamed as "test_sgx_large" the two concurrent loops are run as follows: (for i in $(seq 1 999); do echo "Iteration $i"; sudo ./test_sgx_large; done ) > log.large 2>&1 (for i in $(seq 1 9999); do echo "Iteration $i"; sudo ./test_sgx_small; done ) > log.small 2>&1 If the SGX driver is modified to always WARN when ENCLS[ELDU] encounters a #GP (see below) then the WARN appears after a few iterations of "test_sgx_large" and shows up throughout the testing. diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encls.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encls.h index 99004b02e2ed..68c1dbc84ed3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encls.h +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encls.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ #define ENCLS_WARN(r, name) { \ do { \ int _r = (r); \ - WARN_ONCE(_r, "%s returned %d (0x%x)\n", (name), _r, _r); \ + WARN(_r, "%s returned %d (0x%x)\n", (name), _r, _r); \ } while (0); \ }