| Message ID | 20230106091242.20288-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment | expand |
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote: > @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb) > * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the > * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it. > * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with > - * work cancelation off the exec path. > + * work cancellation off the exec path. > */ > if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle)) > io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx); > @@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd) > bool loop = false; > > io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current); > - /* read completions before cancelations */ > + /* read completions before cancellations */ "cancelations" is not a typo. "cancelations" and "cancellations" are both valid spellings. The former is predominantly used in the US, while the latter is predominantly used in the UK.
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote: > Fix typos in comment. > The cancelation vs cancellation thing is a British vs American spelling difference. (Leave it as-is). regards, dan carpenter
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 58ac13b69dc8..99074d5fe195 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void io_eventfd_flush_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) * Eventfd should only get triggered when at least one event has been * posted. Some applications rely on the eventfd notification count * only changing IFF a new CQE has been added to the CQ ring. There's - * no depedency on 1:1 relationship between how many times this + * no dependency on 1:1 relationship between how many times this * function is called (and hence the eventfd count) and number of CQEs * posted to the CQ ring. */ @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb) * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it. * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with - * work cancelation off the exec path. + * work cancellation off the exec path. */ if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle)) io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx); @@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd) bool loop = false; io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current); - /* read completions before cancelations */ + /* read completions before cancellations */ inflight = tctx_inflight(tctx, !cancel_all); if (!inflight) break;
Fix typos in comment. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com> --- io_uring/io_uring.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)