@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
#define HOST "127.0.0.1"
static __be16 bind_port;
struct recv_data {
- pthread_mutex_t mutex;
+ pthread_barrier_t barrier;
int use_recvmsg;
struct msghdr msg;
};
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ static void *recv_fn(void *data)
ret = t_create_ring_params(1, &ring, &p);
if (ret == T_SETUP_SKIP) {
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&rd->mutex);
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&rd->barrier);
ret = 0;
goto err;
} else if (ret < 0) {
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&rd->mutex);
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&rd->barrier);
goto err;
}
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void *recv_fn(void *data)
fprintf(stderr, "recv_prep failed: %d\n", ret);
goto err;
}
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&rd->mutex);
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&rd->barrier);
ret = do_recv(&ring);
close(sock);
io_uring_queue_exit(&ring);
@@ -219,28 +219,24 @@ err:
static int test(int use_recvmsg)
{
- pthread_mutexattr_t attr;
pthread_t recv_thread;
struct recv_data rd;
int ret;
void *retval;
- pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr);
- pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&attr, 1);
- pthread_mutex_init(&rd.mutex, &attr);
- pthread_mutex_lock(&rd.mutex);
+ pthread_barrier_init(&rd.barrier, NULL, 2);
rd.use_recvmsg = use_recvmsg;
ret = pthread_create(&recv_thread, NULL, recv_fn, &rd);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "Thread create failed: %d\n", ret);
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&rd.mutex);
return 1;
}
- pthread_mutex_lock(&rd.mutex);
+ pthread_barrier_wait(&rd.barrier);
do_send();
pthread_join(recv_thread, &retval);
+ pthread_barrier_destroy(&rd.barrier);
return (intptr_t)retval;
}
Calling pthread_mutex_lock() twice with the same mutex in the same thread without unlocking it first is invalid. The intention behind this pattern was to wait for the recv_fn() thread to be ready. Use the pthread barrier instead. It is more straightforward and correct. Fixes: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/855 Reported-by: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> --- test/recv-msgall.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)