Message ID | 20230808134049.1407498-4-leitao@debian.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands | expand |
Hi Breno, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20230808] [cannot apply to bpf-next/master bpf/master net/main net-next/main linus/master horms-ipvs/master v6.5-rc5 v6.5-rc4 v6.5-rc3 v6.5-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Breno-Leitao/net-expose-sock_use_custom_sol_socket/20230809-011901 base: next-20230808 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230808134049.1407498-4-leitao%40debian.org patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20230808 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230809/202308091352.OnDIGFfN-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230809/202308091352.OnDIGFfN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308091352.OnDIGFfN-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: sock_setsockopt >>> referenced by uring_cmd.c >>> io_uring/uring_cmd.o:(io_uring_cmd_sock) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced by uring_cmd.c >>> io_uring/uring_cmd.o:(io_uring_cmd_sock) in archive vmlinux.a
Hi Breno,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on next-20230808]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/master bpf/master net/main net-next/main linus/master horms-ipvs/master v6.5-rc5 v6.5-rc4 v6.5-rc3 v6.5-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Breno-Leitao/net-expose-sock_use_custom_sol_socket/20230809-011901
base: next-20230808
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230808134049.1407498-4-leitao%40debian.org
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] io_uring/cmd: Introduce SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT
config: m68k-randconfig-r036-20230809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230809/202308091848.hWtNtas3-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230809/202308091848.hWtNtas3-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308091848.hWtNtas3-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
m68k-linux-ld: io_uring/uring_cmd.o: in function `io_uring_cmd_sock':
io_uring/uring_cmd.c:183: undefined reference to `sk_getsockopt'
>> m68k-linux-ld: io_uring/uring_cmd.c:210: undefined reference to `sock_setsockopt'
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h index 8152151080db..3fe82df06abf 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h @@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ enum { SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCINQ = 0, SOCKET_URING_OP_SIOCOUTQ, SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT, + SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT, }; #ifdef __cplusplus diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c index 582931879482..5404b788ca14 100644 --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c @@ -192,6 +192,27 @@ static inline int io_uring_cmd_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, return -EOPNOTSUPP; } +static inline int io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, + struct io_uring_cmd *cmd) +{ + void __user *optval = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(cmd->sqe->optval)); + int optname = READ_ONCE(cmd->sqe->optname); + int optlen = READ_ONCE(cmd->sqe->optlen); + int level = READ_ONCE(cmd->sqe->level); + int err; + + err = security_socket_setsockopt(sock, level, optname); + if (err) + return err; + + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (level == SOL_SOCKET && !sock_use_custom_sol_socket(sock)) + err = sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname, + USER_SOCKPTR(optval), optlen); + + return err; +} + int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags) { struct socket *sock = cmd->file->private_data; @@ -215,6 +236,8 @@ int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags) return arg; case SOCKET_URING_OP_GETSOCKOPT: return io_uring_cmd_getsockopt(sock, cmd); + case SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT: + return io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(sock, cmd); default: return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
Add initial support for SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT. This new command is similar to setsockopt. This initial implementation just cares about SOL_SOCKET level for now. The next patch implements the generic case. Function io_uring_cmd_setsockopt() is inspired by the function __sys_setsockopt(). Important to say that userspace needs to keep the pointer's memory alive until the operation is completed. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> --- include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 1 + io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)