@@ -3498,9 +3498,9 @@ static void *io_uring_validate_mmap_request(struct file *file,
unsigned int bgid;
bgid = (offset & ~IORING_OFF_MMAP_MASK) >> IORING_OFF_PBUF_SHIFT;
- mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
ptr = io_pbuf_get_address(ctx, bgid);
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (!ptr)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
break;
@@ -40,19 +40,35 @@ struct io_buf_free {
int inuse;
};
+static struct io_buffer_list *__io_buffer_get_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct io_buffer_list *bl,
+ unsigned int bgid)
+{
+ if (bl && bgid < BGID_ARRAY)
+ return &bl[bgid];
+
+ return xa_load(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bgid);
+}
+
static inline struct io_buffer_list *io_buffer_get_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
unsigned int bgid)
{
- if (ctx->io_bl && bgid < BGID_ARRAY)
- return &ctx->io_bl[bgid];
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
- return xa_load(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bgid);
+ return __io_buffer_get_list(ctx, ctx->io_bl, bgid);
}
static int io_buffer_add_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_buffer_list *bl, unsigned int bgid)
{
+ /*
+ * Store buffer group ID and finally mark the list as visible.
+ * The normal lookup doesn't care about the visibility as we're
+ * always under the ->uring_lock, but the RCU lookup from mmap does.
+ */
bl->bgid = bgid;
+ smp_store_release(&bl->is_ready, 1);
+
if (bgid < BGID_ARRAY)
return 0;
@@ -203,18 +219,19 @@ void __user *io_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
static __cold int io_init_bl_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
+ struct io_buffer_list *bl;
int i;
- ctx->io_bl = kcalloc(BGID_ARRAY, sizeof(struct io_buffer_list),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ctx->io_bl)
+ bl = kcalloc(BGID_ARRAY, sizeof(struct io_buffer_list), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!bl)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < BGID_ARRAY; i++) {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->io_bl[i].buf_list);
- ctx->io_bl[i].bgid = i;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bl[i].buf_list);
+ bl[i].bgid = i;
}
+ smp_store_release(&ctx->io_bl, bl);
return 0;
}
@@ -303,7 +320,7 @@ void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
xa_for_each(&ctx->io_bl_xa, index, bl) {
xa_erase(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bl->bgid);
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
- kfree(bl);
+ kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
}
/*
@@ -497,7 +514,16 @@ int io_provide_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bl->buf_list);
ret = io_buffer_add_list(ctx, bl, p->bgid);
if (ret) {
- kfree(bl);
+ /*
+ * Doesn't need rcu free as it was never visible, but
+ * let's keep it consistent throughout. Also can't
+ * be a lower indexed array group, as adding one
+ * where lookup failed cannot happen.
+ */
+ if (p->bgid >= BGID_ARRAY)
+ kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
+ else
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
goto err;
}
}
@@ -636,6 +662,8 @@ int io_register_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
struct io_buffer_list *bl, *free_bl = NULL;
int ret;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
+
if (copy_from_user(®, arg, sizeof(reg)))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -690,7 +718,7 @@ int io_register_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
return 0;
}
- kfree(free_bl);
+ kfree_rcu(free_bl, rcu);
return ret;
}
@@ -699,6 +727,8 @@ int io_unregister_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
struct io_uring_buf_reg reg;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
+
if (copy_from_user(®, arg, sizeof(reg)))
return -EFAULT;
if (reg.resv[0] || reg.resv[1] || reg.resv[2])
@@ -715,7 +745,7 @@ int io_unregister_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
if (bl->bgid >= BGID_ARRAY) {
xa_erase(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bl->bgid);
- kfree(bl);
+ kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -724,7 +754,15 @@ void *io_pbuf_get_address(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned long bgid)
{
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
- bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, bgid);
+ bl = __io_buffer_get_list(ctx, smp_load_acquire(&ctx->io_bl), bgid);
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the list is fully setup. Only strictly needed for RCU lookup
+ * via mmap, and in that case only for the array indexed groups. For
+ * the xarray lookups, it's either visible and ready, or not at all.
+ */
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(&bl->is_ready))
+ return NULL;
if (!bl || !bl->is_mmap)
return NULL;
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct io_buffer_list {
struct page **buf_pages;
struct io_uring_buf_ring *buf_ring;
};
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
};
__u16 bgid;
@@ -28,6 +29,8 @@ struct io_buffer_list {
__u8 is_mapped;
/* ring mapped provided buffers, but mmap'ed by application */
__u8 is_mmap;
+ /* bl is visible from an RCU point of view for lookup */
+ __u8 is_ready;
};
struct io_buffer {
mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> --- io_uring/io_uring.c | 4 +-- io_uring/kbuf.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- io_uring/kbuf.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)