@@ -1499,14 +1499,14 @@ void io_free_batch_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_wq_work_node *node)
static void __io_submit_flush_completions(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
__must_hold(&ctx->uring_lock)
{
- struct io_wq_work_node *node, *prev;
struct io_submit_state *state = &ctx->submit_state;
+ struct io_wq_work_node *node;
__io_cq_lock(ctx);
/* must come first to preserve CQE ordering in failure cases */
if (state->cqes_count)
__io_flush_post_cqes(ctx);
- wq_list_for_each(node, prev, &state->compl_reqs) {
+ __wq_list_for_each(node, &state->compl_reqs) {
struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(node, struct io_kiocb,
comp_list);
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
#include <linux/io_uring_types.h>
+#define __wq_list_for_each(pos, head) \
+ for (pos = (head)->first; pos; pos = (pos)->next)
+
#define wq_list_for_each(pos, prv, head) \
for (pos = (head)->first, prv = NULL; pos; prv = pos, pos = (pos)->next)
@@ -113,4 +116,4 @@ static inline struct io_wq_work *wq_next_work(struct io_wq_work *work)
return container_of(work->list.next, struct io_wq_work, list);
}
-#endif // INTERNAL_IO_SLIST_H
\ No newline at end of file
+#endif // INTERNAL_IO_SLIST_H
If io_uring.o is built with W=1, it triggers a warning: io_uring/io_uring.c: In function ?__io_submit_flush_completions?: io_uring/io_uring.c:1502:40: warning: variable ?prev? set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 1502 | struct io_wq_work_node *node, *prev; | ^~~~ which is due to the wq_list_for_each() iterator always keeping a 'prev' variable. Most users need this to remove an entry from a list, for example, but __io_submit_flush_completions() never does that. Add a basic helper that doesn't track prev instead, and use that in that function. Reported-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ---