From patchwork Tue Jun 16 16:02:29 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Bottomley X-Patchwork-Id: 11608151 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93E8913 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B657B208D5 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="p2ihQV6S" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732075AbgFPQJg (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:09:36 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:42916 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732662AbgFPQJ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:09:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117DE8EE2A2; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1592323767; bh=3llJlnxLs5DVHn0G5ki4HHdzA1ryCBQlECPHy1QLDlY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=p2ihQV6SVunDj1zEg8vPa4CD1lndbH8YQC1Ptn/ueuPp6j8/5a71jwy69L0ajBi32 eSNw+O81M9EsUsTTKG8iku1enykiv8gotkZvelK4X8y48wTReuLKCr3nQBT9nIF5/S KumC5utLzqXZNd5P6uU3BYtYcGf2VdUwhH8Eox0A= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J4TDYPuUlho3; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com [153.66.160.226]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E45A8EE188; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:09:26 -0700 (PDT) From: James Bottomley To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: [PATCH v10 8/8] security: keys: trusted: implement counter/timer policy Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:02:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20200616160229.8018-9-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200616160229.8018-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20200616160229.8018-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: keyrings-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org This is actually a generic policy allowing a range of comparisons against any value set in the TPM Clock, which includes things like the reset count, a monotonic millisecond count and the restart count. The most useful comparison is against the millisecond count for expiring keys. However, you have to remember that currently Linux doesn't try to sync the epoch timer with the TPM, so the expiration is actually measured in how long the TPM itself has been powered on ... the TPM timer doesn't count while the system is powered down. The millisecond counter is a u64 quantity found at offset 8 in the timer structure, and the <= comparision operand is 9, so a policy set to expire after the TPM has been up for 100 seconds would look like 0000016d00000000000f424000080009 Where 0x16d is the counter timer policy code and 0xf4240 is 100 000 in hex. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- .../security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++ include/linux/tpm.h | 1 + security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++- security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst index b68d3eb73f00..53a6196c7df9 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst @@ -241,3 +241,32 @@ about the usage can be found in the file Another new format 'enc32' has been defined in order to support encrypted keys with payload size of 32 bytes. This will initially be used for nvdimm security but may expand to other usages that require 32 bytes payload. + +Appendix +-------- + +TPM 2.0 Policies +---------------- + +The current TPM supports PCR lock policies as documented above and +CounterTimer policies which can be used to create expiring keys. One +caveat with expiring keys is that the TPM millisecond counter does not +update while a system is powered off and Linux does not sync the TPM +millisecond count with its internal clock, so the best you can expire +in is in terms of how long any given TPM has been powered on. (FIXME: +Linux should simply update the millisecond clock to the current number +of seconds past the epoch on boot). + +A CounterTimer policy is expressed in terms of length and offset +against the TPM clock structure (TPMS_TIME_INFO), which looks like the +packed structure:: + + struct tpms_time_info { + u64 uptime; /* time in ms since last start or reset */ + u64 clock; /* cumulative uptime in ms */ + u32 resetcount; /* numer of times the TPM has been reset */ + u32 restartcount; /* number of times the TPM has been restarted */ + u8 safe /* time was safely loaded from NVRam */ + }; + +The usual comparison for expiring keys is against clock, at offset 8. diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index e32e9728adce..5026a06977e1 100644 --- a/include/linux/tpm.h +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182, TPM2_CC_EVENT_SEQUENCE_COMPLETE = 0x0185, TPM2_CC_HASH_SEQUENCE_START = 0x0186, + TPM2_CC_POLICY_PASSWORD = 0x018c, TPM2_CC_CREATE_LOADED = 0x0191, TPM2_CC_LAST = 0x0193, /* Spec 1.36 */ }; diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c index 87a13e607eca..bd8eb02e1094 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c @@ -197,7 +197,8 @@ int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, len = *plen; } - crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policy, len); + if (len) + crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policy, len); /* now output the intermediate to the policydigest */ crypto_shash_final(sdesc, policydigest); @@ -332,6 +333,16 @@ int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, u32 cmd = pols->code[i]; struct tpm_buf buf; + if (cmd == TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE) + /* + * both PolicyAuthValue and PolicyPassword + * hash to the same thing, but one triggers + * HMAC authentication and the other simple + * authentication. Since we have no HMAC + * code, we're choosing the simple + */ + cmd = TPM2_CC_POLICY_PASSWORD; + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, cmd); if (rc) return rc; @@ -352,8 +363,35 @@ int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], pols->len[i] - pols->hash_size); break; + + case TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER: { + /* + * the format of this is the last two u16 + * quantities are the offset and operation + * respectively. The rest is operandB which + * must be zero padded in a hash digest + */ + u16 opb_len = pols->len[i] - 4; + + if (opb_len > pols->hash_size) + return -EINVAL; + + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, opb_len); + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], opb_len); + + /* offset and operand*/ + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i] + opb_len, 4); + failure = "Counter Timer"; + + break; + } + default: failure = "unknown policy"; + if (pols->len[i]) + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], + pols->len[i]); + break; } diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c index 98c65431ca75..3ec01ed874d9 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 flags; int i; int rc; + static const int POLICY_SIZE = 2 * PAGE_SIZE; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tpm2_hash_map); i++) { if (options->hash == tpm2_hash_map[i].crypto_id) { @@ -268,7 +269,7 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, /* 4 array len, 2 hash alg */ const int len = 4 + 2 + options->pcrinfo_len; - pols = kmalloc(sizeof(*pols) + len, GFP_KERNEL); + pols = kmalloc(POLICY_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pols) return -ENOMEM; @@ -289,6 +290,39 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, return -EINVAL; } + /* + * if we already have a policy, we have to add authorization + * to it. If we don't, we can simply follow the usual + * non-policy route. + */ + if (options->blobauth_len != 0 && payload->policies) { + struct tpm2_policies *pols; + static u8 *scratch; + int i; + bool found = false; + + pols = payload->policies; + + /* make sure it's not already in policy */ + for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { + if (pols->code[i] == TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE) { + found = true; + + break; + } + } + + if (!found) { + i = pols->count++; + scratch = pols->policies[i - 1] + pols->len[i - 1]; + + /* the TPM2_PolicyPassword command has no payload */ + pols->policies[i] = scratch; + pols->len[i] = 0; + pols->code[i] = TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE; + } + } + if (payload->policies) { rc = tpm2_generate_policy_digest(payload->policies, options->hash,