Message ID | 1599728030-17085-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features | expand |
Michael, are you going to pick this series? On 10.09.20 10:53, Pierre Morel wrote: > Hi all, > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > I changed VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM > I forgot in drivers/virtio/Kconfig, and put back the inclusion > of virtio_config.h for the definition of the callback in > arch/s390/mm/init.c I wrongly removed in the last series. > > Regards, > Pierre > > > Pierre Morel (2): > virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions > s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection > > arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/s390/mm/init.c | 11 +++++++++++ > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+) >
Will do for the next Linux. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:15:17PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Michael, > > are you going to pick this series? > > > On 10.09.20 10:53, Pierre Morel wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > > > I changed VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM > > I forgot in drivers/virtio/Kconfig, and put back the inclusion > > of virtio_config.h for the definition of the callback in > > arch/s390/mm/init.c I wrongly removed in the last series. > > > > Regards, > > Pierre > > > > > > Pierre Morel (2): > > virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions > > s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection > > > > arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 + > > arch/s390/mm/init.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+) > >