Message ID | 20220125230518.1697048-1-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: x86/mmu: Clean up {Host,MMU}-writable documentation and validation | expand |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 3:05 PM David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> wrote: > > This series cleans up some documentation and WARNings related to > MMU-writable and Host-writable bits based on suggestions from Sean on > another patch [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/YeH5QlwgGcpStZyp@google.com/ > > David Matlack (5): > KVM: x86/mmu: Move SPTE writable invariant checks to a helper function > KVM: x86/mmu: Check SPTE writable invariants when setting leaf SPTEs > KVM: x86/mmu: Move is_writable_pte() to spte.h > KVM: x86/mmu: Rename DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE to > DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE > KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate comments about {Host,MMU}-writable The email threading on this series got a bit messed up (at least on lore). I had a misspelling in the signed-off-by tag in patch 4 that was caught by git-send-email after sending the cover letter and patches 1-3. So I fixed it and sent patch 4 and 5 separately. I can resend the series again if anyone prefers. > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 38 ------------- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 11 ++-- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 13 +---- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 3 + > 5 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: e2e83a73d7ce66f62c7830a85619542ef59c90e4 > -- > 2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog >
On 1/26/22 00:16, David Matlack wrote: >> >> David Matlack (5): >> KVM: x86/mmu: Move SPTE writable invariant checks to a helper function >> KVM: x86/mmu: Check SPTE writable invariants when setting leaf SPTEs >> KVM: x86/mmu: Move is_writable_pte() to spte.h >> KVM: x86/mmu: Rename DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE to >> DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE >> KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate comments about {Host,MMU}-writable > The email threading on this series got a bit messed up (at least on > lore). I had a misspelling in the signed-off-by tag in patch 4 that > was caught by git-send-email after sending the cover letter and > patches 1-3. So I fixed it and sent patch 4 and 5 separately. > > I can resend the series again if anyone prefers. > Not sure how that's even possible, but Thunderbird showed me correct threading. Patch queued now, thanks. Next time this happens you can send the other patches with --in-reply-to --no-thread: --in-reply-to=<identifier> Make the first mail (or all the mails with --no-thread) appear as a reply to the given Message-Id [...] Thanks, Paolo