Message ID | 20221220161236.555143-1-aaronlewis@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce and test masked events | expand |
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:12:29 +0000, Aaron Lewis wrote: > This series introduces the concept of masked events to the pmu event > filter. Masked events can help reduce the number of events needed in the > pmu event filter by allowing a more generalized matching method to be > used for the unit mask when filtering guest events in the pmu. With > masked events, if an event select should be restricted from the guest, > instead of having to add an entry to the pmu event filter for each > event select + unit mask pair, a masked event can be added to generalize > the unit mask values. > > [...] Applied to kvm-x86 pmu, thanks! [1/7] kvm: x86/pmu: Correct the mask used in a pmu event filter lookup https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/aa570a7481c3 [2/7] kvm: x86/pmu: Remove impossible events from the pmu event filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/778e86e3a2fd [3/7] kvm: x86/pmu: prepare the pmu event filter for masked events https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/11794a3da07f [4/7] kvm: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/651daa44b11c [5/7] selftests: kvm/x86: Add flags when creating a pmu event filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/6a6b17a7c594 [6/7] selftests: kvm/x86: Add testing for KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/b1a865796643 [7/7] selftests: kvm/x86: Test masked events https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/5ed12ae83c4c -- https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:12:29 +0000, Aaron Lewis wrote: > > This series introduces the concept of masked events to the pmu event > > filter. Masked events can help reduce the number of events needed in the > > pmu event filter by allowing a more generalized matching method to be > > used for the unit mask when filtering guest events in the pmu. With > > masked events, if an event select should be restricted from the guest, > > instead of having to add an entry to the pmu event filter for each > > event select + unit mask pair, a masked event can be added to generalize > > the unit mask values. > > > > [...] > > Applied to kvm-x86 pmu, thanks! > > [1/7] kvm: x86/pmu: Correct the mask used in a pmu event filter lookup > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/aa570a7481c3 > [2/7] kvm: x86/pmu: Remove impossible events from the pmu event filter > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/778e86e3a2fd > [3/7] kvm: x86/pmu: prepare the pmu event filter for masked events > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/11794a3da07f > [4/7] kvm: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/651daa44b11c > [5/7] selftests: kvm/x86: Add flags when creating a pmu event filter > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/6a6b17a7c594 > [6/7] selftests: kvm/x86: Add testing for KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/b1a865796643 > [7/7] selftests: kvm/x86: Test masked events > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/5ed12ae83c4c FYI, I forced pushed to pmu to fix a minor warning in the docs and decided to opportunistically update all of the shortlogs to fix (again minor) issues with the scope since this series is currently the only thing sitting in pmu. [1/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Correct the mask used in a pmu event filter lookup https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/1d2489485e28 [2/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove impossible events from the pmu event filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/1110a9128858 [3/7] KVM: x86/pmu: prepare the pmu event filter for masked events https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/3b049af387c4 [4/7] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/22f39725f0f6 [5/7] KVM: selftests: Add flags when creating a pmu event filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/963fd783390f [6/7] KVM: selftests: Add testing for KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/1c1045925ed4 [7/7] KVM: selftests: Test masked events in PMU filter https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/526d9f600225
This series introduces the concept of masked events to the pmu event filter. Masked events can help reduce the number of events needed in the pmu event filter by allowing a more generalized matching method to be used for the unit mask when filtering guest events in the pmu. With masked events, if an event select should be restricted from the guest, instead of having to add an entry to the pmu event filter for each event select + unit mask pair, a masked event can be added to generalize the unit mask values. Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> v7 -> v8 - Rebased on top of the latest in kvm/queue. - s/num_gp_counters/X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS/ in the masked events test. v6 -> v7 - Rebased on top of the latest in kvm/queue. [Like] - Patch #7, Added comment about how counters value are used. [Sean] v5 -> v6 - The following changes were based on Sean's feedback. - Patch #1, Use a const for EVENTSEL_EVENT rather than a callback. - Patch #2, s/invalid/impossible and removed helpers. - Patch #3, Ditched internal event struct. Sticking with arch layout. - Patch #4, - Switched masked events to follow arch layout. - Created an internal struct for the pmu event filter. - Track separate lists for include events and exclude events. - General refactors as a result of these changes. v4 -> v5 - Patch #3, Simplified the return logic in filter_contains_match(). [Jim] - Patch #4, Corrected documentation for errors and returns. [Jim] - Patch #6, Added TEST_REQUIRE for KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. [Jim] - Patch #7, - Removed TEST_REQUIRE for KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS (moved it to patch #6). - Changed the assert to a branch in supports_event_mem_inst_retired(). [Jim] - Added a check to make sure 3 GP counters are available. [Jim] v3 -> v4 - Patch #1, Fix the mask for the guest event select used in bsearch. - Patch #2, Remove invalid events from the pmu event filter. - Patch #3, Create an internal/common representation for filter events. - Patch #4, - Use a common filter event to simplify kernel code. [Jim] - s/invalid/exclude for masked events. More descriptive. [Sean] - Simplified masked event layout. There was no need to complicate it. - Add KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_MASKED_EVENTS. - Patch #7, Rewrote the masked events tests using MEM_INST_RETIRED (0xd0) on Intel and LS Dispatch (0x29) on AMD. They have multiple unit masks each which were leveraged for improved masked events testing. v2 -> v3 - Reworked and documented the invert flag usage. It was possible to get ambiguous results when using it. That should not be possible now. - Added testing for inverted masked events to validate the updated implementation. - Removed testing for inverted masked events from the masked events test. They were meaningless with the updated implementation. More meaning tests were added separately. v1 -> v2 - Made has_invalid_event() static to fix warning. - Fixed checkpatch.pl errors and warnings. - Updated to account for KVM_X86_PMU_OP(). Aaron Lewis (7): kvm: x86/pmu: Correct the mask used in a pmu event filter lookup kvm: x86/pmu: Remove impossible events from the pmu event filter kvm: x86/pmu: prepare the pmu event filter for masked events kvm: x86/pmu: Introduce masked events to the pmu event filter selftests: kvm/x86: Add flags when creating a pmu event filter selftests: kvm/x86: Add testing for KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER selftests: kvm/x86: Test masked events Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 77 +++- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 14 +- arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 29 ++ arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 241 +++++++++-- arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 2 + arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 + .../kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 381 +++++++++++++++++- 10 files changed, 697 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)