@@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ int kvm_mmio_write(void *opaque, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *data, int len)
return 0;
}
-static int handle_unhandled(kvm_context_t kvm, kvm_vcpu_context_t vcpu,
- uint64_t reason)
+static int handle_unhandled(uint64_t reason)
{
fprintf(stderr, "kvm: unhandled exit %"PRIx64"\n", reason);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1085,12 +1084,10 @@ again:
if (1) {
switch (run->exit_reason) {
case KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN:
- r = handle_unhandled(kvm, vcpu,
- run->hw.hardware_exit_reason);
+ r = handle_unhandled(run->hw.hardware_exit_reason);
break;
case KVM_EXIT_FAIL_ENTRY:
- r = handle_unhandled(kvm, vcpu,
- run->fail_entry.hardware_entry_failure_reason);
+ r = handle_unhandled(run->fail_entry.hardware_entry_failure_reason);
break;
case KVM_EXIT_EXCEPTION:
fprintf(stderr, "exception %d (%x)\n",
I'm in an ongoing process of not using kvm-specific types in function declarations. handle_unhandled() is the first victim. Since we don't really use this data, but just the reason, remove them entirely. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com> --- qemu-kvm.c | 9 +++------ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)