[2/2] kvm: don't use bit24 for detecting address-specific invalidation capability

Commit Message

Zhang, Xiantao Dec. 4, 2012, 5:55 p.m. UTC

From: Zhang Xiantao <[e-mail]>

Bit24 in VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP_MASI is  not used for address-specific invalidation capability
reporting, so remove it from KVM to avoid conflicts in future.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiantao <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h |    3 +--
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c         |   16 ----------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
index 36ec21c..c2d56b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
@@ -445,8 +445,7 @@  enum vmcs_field {
 #define VMX_EPTP_WB_BIT				(1ull << 14)
 #define VMX_EPT_2MB_PAGE_BIT			(1ull << 16)
 #define VMX_EPT_1GB_PAGE_BIT			(1ull << 17)
-#define VMX_EPT_AD_BIT					(1ull << 21)
-#define VMX_EPT_EXTENT_INDIVIDUAL_BIT		(1ull << 24)
+#define VMX_EPT_AD_BIT				    (1ull << 21)
 #define VMX_EPT_EXTENT_CONTEXT_BIT		(1ull << 25)
 #define VMX_EPT_EXTENT_GLOBAL_BIT		(1ull << 26)
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index d077996..81b1aa6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -802,11 +802,6 @@  static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_ept_ad_bits(void)
 	return vmx_capability.ept & VMX_EPT_AD_BIT;
 }
 
-static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invept_individual_addr(void)
-{
-	return vmx_capability.ept & VMX_EPT_EXTENT_INDIVIDUAL_BIT;
-}
-
 static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invept_context(void)
 {
 	return vmx_capability.ept & VMX_EPT_EXTENT_CONTEXT_BIT;
@@ -1051,17 +1046,6 @@  static inline void ept_sync_context(u64 eptp)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline void ept_sync_individual_addr(u64 eptp, gpa_t gpa)
-{
-	if (enable_ept) {
-		if (cpu_has_vmx_invept_individual_addr())
-			__invept(VMX_EPT_EXTENT_INDIVIDUAL_ADDR,
-					eptp, gpa);
-		else
-			ept_sync_context(eptp);
-	}
-}
-
 static __always_inline unsigned long vmcs_readl(unsigned long field)
 {
 	unsigned long value;