Message ID | 1502095466-21312-4-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 07.08.2017 10:44, Longpeng(Mike) wrote: > Implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_spin/preempt_in_kernel() for arm/s390, > they needn't cache the result. > > Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> > --- > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++-- > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index f78cdc2..49b9178 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -2449,12 +2449,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - return false; > + return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE); > } > > bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - return false; > + return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE); > } > > void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > index e45f780..956f025 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > @@ -418,12 +418,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v) > > bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - return false; > + return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu); > } > > bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - return false; > + return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu); > } > > /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */ > Can you split that into two parts? (arm and s390x?)
On 2017/8/7 16:52, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 07.08.2017 10:44, Longpeng(Mike) wrote: >> Implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_spin/preempt_in_kernel() for arm/s390, >> they needn't cache the result. >> >> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> >> --- >> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++-- >> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++-- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> index f78cdc2..49b9178 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> @@ -2449,12 +2449,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> >> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> - return false; >> + return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE); >> } >> >> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> - return false; >> + return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE); >> } >> >> void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c >> index e45f780..956f025 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c >> @@ -418,12 +418,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v) >> >> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> - return false; >> + return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu); >> } >> >> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> - return false; >> + return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu); >> } >> >> /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */ >> > > Can you split that into two parts? (arm and s390x?) OK, I'll split in V2. :) >
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c index f78cdc2..49b9178 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -2449,12 +2449,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - return false; + return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE); } bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - return false; + return !(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE); } void kvm_s390_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index e45f780..956f025 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c @@ -418,12 +418,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v) bool kvm_arch_vcpu_spin_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - return false; + return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu); } bool kvm_arch_vcpu_preempt_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - return false; + return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu); } /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */
Implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_spin/preempt_in_kernel() for arm/s390, they needn't cache the result. Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++-- virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)