From patchwork Thu Feb 14 09:06:04 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Wang, Wei W" X-Patchwork-Id: 10812153 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF39922 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1A62D85E for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 9379B2D863; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:44:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363CA2D85E for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395221AbfBNJoa (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 04:44:30 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:32197 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392986AbfBNJmv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 04:42:51 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2019 01:42:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,368,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="124411702" Received: from devel-ww.sh.intel.com ([10.239.48.128]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2019 01:42:48 -0800 From: Wei Wang To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org Cc: kan.liang@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, like.xu@intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, jannh@google.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, jmattson@google.com Subject: [PATCH v5 02/12] perf/x86: add a function to get the lbr stack Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:06:04 +0800 Message-Id: <1550135174-5423-3-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1550135174-5423-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> References: <1550135174-5423-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP The LBR stack MSRs are architecturally specific. The perf subsystem has already assigned the abstracted MSR values based on the CPU architecture. This patch enables a caller outside the perf subsystem to get the LBR stack info. This is useful for hyperviosrs to prepare the lbr feature for the guest. Signed-off-by: Wei Wang Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Peter Zijlstra --- arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c index c88ed39..594a91b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c @@ -1277,3 +1277,26 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_knl(void) if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_LIP) x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format = LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS; } + +/** + * x86_perf_get_lbr_stack - get the lbr stack related MSRs + * + * @stack: the caller's memory to get the lbr stack + * + * Returns: 0 indicates that the lbr stack has been successfully obtained. + */ +int x86_perf_get_lbr_stack(struct x86_perf_lbr_stack *stack) +{ + stack->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr; + stack->tos = x86_pmu.lbr_tos; + stack->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from; + stack->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to; + + if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) + stack->info = MSR_LBR_INFO_0; + else + stack->info = 0; + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_perf_get_lbr_stack); diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h index 8bdf749..2f82795 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h @@ -275,7 +275,16 @@ struct perf_guest_switch_msr { u64 host, guest; }; +struct x86_perf_lbr_stack { + unsigned int nr; + unsigned int tos; + unsigned int from; + unsigned int to; + unsigned int info; +}; + extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr); +extern int x86_perf_get_lbr_stack(struct x86_perf_lbr_stack *stack); extern void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap); extern void perf_check_microcode(void); extern int x86_perf_rdpmc_index(struct perf_event *event); @@ -286,6 +295,11 @@ static inline struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr) return NULL; } +static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr_stack(struct x86_perf_lbr_stack *stack) +{ + return -1; +} + static inline void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap) { memset(cap, 0, sizeof(*cap));