[4/4] KVM: protect assigned dev workqueue, int handler and irq acker

Commit Message

Marcelo Tosatti May 7, 2009, 8:55 p.m. UTC

kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq is vulnerable to a race condition with the
interrupt handler function. It does:

        if (dev->host_irq_disabled) {
                enable_irq(dev->host_irq);
                dev->host_irq_disabled = false;
        }

If an interrupt triggers before the host->dev_irq_disabled assignment,
it will disable the interrupt and set dev->host_irq_disabled to true.

On return to kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq, dev->host_irq_disabled is set to
false, and the next kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq call will fail to reenable
it.

Other than that, having the interrupt handler and work handlers run in
parallel sounds like asking for trouble (could not spot any obvious
problem, but better not have to, its fragile).

CC: [e-mail]
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <[e-mail]>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [e-mail]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

Index: kvm-pending/include/linux/kvm_host.h
===================================================================
--- kvm-pending.orig/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ kvm-pending/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@  struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {
 	int flags;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
 	struct kvm *kvm;
+	spinlock_t assigned_dev_lock;
 };
 
 struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier {
Index: kvm-pending/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
===================================================================
--- kvm-pending.orig/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ kvm-pending/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/mman.h>
 #include <linux/swap.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
 
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
@@ -130,6 +131,7 @@  static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_w
 	 * finer-grained lock, update this
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock);
 	if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_MSIX) {
 		struct kvm_guest_msix_entry *guest_entries =
 			assigned_dev->guest_msix_entries;
@@ -156,18 +158,21 @@  static void kvm_assigned_dev_interrupt_w
 		}
 	}
 
+	spin_unlock_irq(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&assigned_dev->kvm->lock);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *assigned_dev =
 		(struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *) dev_id;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
 	if (assigned_dev->irq_requested_type & KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_MSIX) {
 		int index = find_index_from_host_irq(assigned_dev, irq);
 		if (index < 0)
-			return IRQ_HANDLED;
+			goto out;
 		assigned_dev->guest_msix_entries[index].flags |=
 			KVM_ASSIGNED_MSIX_PENDING;
 	}
@@ -177,6 +182,8 @@  static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr
 	disable_irq_nosync(irq);
 	assigned_dev->host_irq_disabled = true;
 
+out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&assigned_dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
@@ -184,6 +191,7 @@  static irqreturn_t kvm_assigned_dev_intr
 static void kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
 {
 	struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel *dev;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (kian->gsi == -1)
 		return;
@@ -196,10 +204,12 @@  static void kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq(str
 	/* The guest irq may be shared so this ack may be
 	 * from another device.
 	 */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
 	if (dev->host_irq_disabled) {
 		enable_irq(dev->host_irq);
 		dev->host_irq_disabled = false;
 	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->assigned_dev_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void deassign_guest_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -615,6 +625,7 @@  static int kvm_vm_ioctl_assign_device(st
 	match->host_devfn = assigned_dev->devfn;
 	match->flags = assigned_dev->flags;
 	match->dev = dev;
+	spin_lock_init(&match->assigned_dev_lock);
 	match->irq_source_id = -1;
 	match->kvm = kvm;
 	match->ack_notifier.irq_acked = kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq;