From patchwork Wed Dec 8 17:09:11 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nadav Har'El X-Patchwork-Id: 391212 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by demeter1.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB8H9Hxv020113 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:09:17 GMT Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753995Ab0LHRJO (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:09:14 -0500 Received: from mtagate2.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.162]:48201 "EHLO mtagate2.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753537Ab0LHRJO (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:09:14 -0500 Received: from d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.233]) by mtagate2.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oB8H9Dtb001726 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:09:13 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id oB8H9ETo3059752 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:09:14 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id oB8H9Coi008752 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:09:13 -0700 Received: from rice.haifa.ibm.com (rice.haifa.ibm.com [9.148.8.217]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id oB8H9Cjb008747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:09:12 -0700 Received: from rice.haifa.ibm.com (lnx-nyh.haifa.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by rice.haifa.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB8H9BRV008745; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:09:11 +0200 Received: (from nyh@localhost) by rice.haifa.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB8H9BdA008743; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:09:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:09:11 +0200 Message-Id: <201012081709.oB8H9BdA008743@rice.haifa.ibm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: rice.haifa.ibm.com: nyh set sender to "Nadav Har'El" using -f Cc: gleb@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com To: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: "Nadav Har'El" References: <1291827596-nyh@il.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH 18/28] nVMX: No need for handle_vmx_insn function any more Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (demeter1.kernel.org [140.211.167.41]); Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:09:17 +0000 (UTC) --- .before/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c 2010-12-08 18:56:51.000000000 +0200 +++ .after/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c 2010-12-08 18:56:51.000000000 +0200 @@ -4025,12 +4025,6 @@ static int handle_vmcall(struct kvm_vcpu return 1; } -static int handle_vmx_insn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR); - return 1; -} - static int handle_invd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return emulate_instruction(vcpu, 0, 0, 0) == EMULATE_DONE;