From patchwork Thu Jan 27 08:34:58 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nadav Har'El X-Patchwork-Id: 510551 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by demeter1.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0R8Z7ZX013275 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:35:07 GMT Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752464Ab1A0IfD (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:35:03 -0500 Received: from mtagate1.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.161]:44127 "EHLO mtagate1.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751752Ab1A0IfC (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:35:02 -0500 Received: from d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.233]) by mtagate1.uk.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0R8Z1Sw006345 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:35:01 GMT Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216]) by d06nrmr1507.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p0R8Z3Xa1339440 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:35:03 GMT Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p0R8Z0PN028204 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:35:00 -0700 Received: from rice.haifa.ibm.com (rice.haifa.ibm.com [9.148.8.217]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p0R8YxZW028134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:35:00 -0700 Received: from rice.haifa.ibm.com (lnx-nyh.haifa.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by rice.haifa.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0R8YwVg002550; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:34:59 +0200 Received: (from nyh@localhost) by rice.haifa.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0R8Yw1X002548; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:34:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:34:58 +0200 Message-Id: <201101270834.p0R8Yw1X002548@rice.haifa.ibm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: rice.haifa.ibm.com: nyh set sender to "Nadav Har'El" using -f Cc: gleb@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com To: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: "Nadav Har'El" References: <1296116987-nyh@il.ibm.com> Subject: [PATCH 10/29] nVMX: Success/failure of VMX instructions. Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (demeter1.kernel.org [140.211.167.41]); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:35:07 +0000 (UTC) --- .before/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c 2011-01-26 18:06:04.000000000 +0200 +++ .after/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c 2011-01-26 18:06:04.000000000 +0200 @@ -4553,6 +4553,36 @@ static int get_vmx_mem_address(struct kv } /* + * The following 3 functions, nested_vmx_succeed()/failValid()/failInvalid(), + * set the success or error code of an emulated VMX instruction, as specified + * by Vol 2B, VMX Instruction Reference, "Conventions". + */ +static void nested_vmx_succeed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + vmx_set_rflags(vcpu, vmx_get_rflags(vcpu) + & ~(X86_EFLAGS_CF | X86_EFLAGS_PF | X86_EFLAGS_AF | + X86_EFLAGS_ZF | X86_EFLAGS_SF | X86_EFLAGS_OF)); +} + +static void nested_vmx_failInvalid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + vmx_set_rflags(vcpu, (vmx_get_rflags(vcpu) + & ~(X86_EFLAGS_PF | X86_EFLAGS_AF | X86_EFLAGS_ZF | + X86_EFLAGS_SF | X86_EFLAGS_OF)) + | X86_EFLAGS_CF); +} + +static void nested_vmx_failValid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + u32 vm_instruction_error) +{ + vmx_set_rflags(vcpu, (vmx_get_rflags(vcpu) + & ~(X86_EFLAGS_CF | X86_EFLAGS_PF | X86_EFLAGS_AF | + X86_EFLAGS_SF | X86_EFLAGS_OF)) + | X86_EFLAGS_ZF); + get_vmcs12_fields(vcpu)->vm_instruction_error = vm_instruction_error; +} + +/* * The exit handlers return 1 if the exit was handled fully and guest execution * may resume. Otherwise they set the kvm_run parameter to indicate what needs * to be done to userspace and return 0. --- .before/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h 2011-01-26 18:06:04.000000000 +0200 +++ .after/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h 2011-01-26 18:06:04.000000000 +0200 @@ -426,4 +426,35 @@ struct vmx_msr_entry { u64 value; } __aligned(16); +/* + * VM-instruction error numbers + */ +enum vm_instruction_error_number { + VMXERR_VMCALL_IN_VMX_ROOT_OPERATION = 1, + VMXERR_VMCLEAR_INVALID_ADDRESS = 2, + VMXERR_VMCLEAR_VMXON_POINTER = 3, + VMXERR_VMLAUNCH_NONCLEAR_VMCS = 4, + VMXERR_VMRESUME_NONLAUNCHED_VMCS = 5, + VMXERR_VMRESUME_AFTER_VMXOFF = 6, + VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD = 7, + VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_HOST_STATE_FIELD = 8, + VMXERR_VMPTRLD_INVALID_ADDRESS = 9, + VMXERR_VMPTRLD_VMXON_POINTER = 10, + VMXERR_VMPTRLD_INCORRECT_VMCS_REVISION_ID = 11, + VMXERR_UNSUPPORTED_VMCS_COMPONENT = 12, + VMXERR_VMWRITE_READ_ONLY_VMCS_COMPONENT = 13, + VMXERR_VMXON_IN_VMX_ROOT_OPERATION = 15, + VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_EXECUTIVE_VMCS_POINTER = 16, + VMXERR_ENTRY_NONLAUNCHED_EXECUTIVE_VMCS = 17, + VMXERR_ENTRY_EXECUTIVE_VMCS_POINTER_NOT_VMXON_POINTER = 18, + VMXERR_VMCALL_NONCLEAR_VMCS = 19, + VMXERR_VMCALL_INVALID_VM_EXIT_CONTROL_FIELDS = 20, + VMXERR_VMCALL_INCORRECT_MSEG_REVISION_ID = 22, + VMXERR_VMXOFF_UNDER_DUAL_MONITOR_TREATMENT_OF_SMIS_AND_SMM = 23, + VMXERR_VMCALL_INVALID_SMM_MONITOR_FEATURES = 24, + VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_VM_EXECUTION_CONTROL_FIELDS_IN_EXECUTIVE_VMCS = 25, + VMXERR_ENTRY_EVENTS_BLOCKED_BY_MOV_SS = 26, + VMXERR_INVALID_OPERAND_TO_INVEPT_INVVPID = 28, +}; + #endif