Message ID | 20160515041413.2280.747.stgit@mars (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 09:44:13AM +0530, Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote: > From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > OPAL_CALL wrapper code sticks the r1 (stack pointer) into PACAR1 purely > for debugging purpose only. The power7_wakeup* functions relies on stack > pointer saved in PACAR1. Any opal call made using opal wrapper (directly > or in-directly) before we fall through power7_wakeup*, then it ends up > replacing r1 in PACAR1(r13) leading to kernel panic. So far we don't see > any issues because we have never made any opal calls using OPAL wrapper > before power7_wakeup*. But the subsequent HMI patch would need to invoke > C calls during cpu wakeup/idle path that in-directly makes opal call using > opal wrapper. This patch facilitates the subsequent HMI patch by removing > usage of PACAR1 from opal call wrapper. > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Thanks, both patches applied to my kvm-ppc-next branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S index e45b88a..df6ad94 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION(0, 1); \ OPAL_BRANCH(opal_tracepoint_entry) \ mfcr r12; \ stw r12,8(r1); \ - std r1,PACAR1(r13); \ li r11,0; \ mfmsr r12; \ ori r11,r11,MSR_EE; \ @@ -127,7 +126,6 @@ opal_tracepoint_entry: mfcr r12 std r11,16(r1) stw r12,8(r1) - std r1,PACAR1(r13) li r11,0 mfmsr r12 ori r11,r11,MSR_EE