@@ -774,12 +774,8 @@ int kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
tvcpu->arch.prodded = 1;
smp_mb();
- if (vcpu->arch.ceded) {
- if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq)) {
- swake_up(&vcpu->wq);
- vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup++;
- }
- }
+ if (tvcpu->arch.ceded)
+ kvmppc_fast_vcpu_kick_hv(tvcpu);
break;
case H_CONFER:
target = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 4);
@@ -2621,7 +2617,8 @@ static int kvmppc_vcore_check_block(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
int i;
for_each_runnable_thread(i, vcpu, vc) {
- if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions || !vcpu->arch.ceded)
+ if (vcpu->arch.pending_exceptions || !vcpu->arch.ceded ||
+ vcpu->arch.prodded)
return 1;
}
@@ -2807,7 +2804,7 @@ static int kvmppc_run_vcpu(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
break;
n_ceded = 0;
for_each_runnable_thread(i, v, vc) {
- if (!v->arch.pending_exceptions)
+ if (!v->arch.pending_exceptions && !v->arch.prodded)
n_ceded += v->arch.ceded;
else
v->arch.ceded = 0;
The H_PROD hypercall is supposed to wake up an idle vcpu. We have an implementation, but because Linux doesn't use it except when doing cpu hotplug, it was never tested properly. AIX does use it, and reported it broken. It turns out we were waking the wrong vcpu (the one doing H_PROD, not the target of the prod) and we weren't handling the case where the target needs an IPI to wake it. Fix it by using the existing kvmppc_fast_vcpu_kick_hv() function, which is intended for this kind of thing, and by using the target vcpu not the current vcpu. We were also not looking at the prodded flag when checking whether a ceded vcpu should wake up, so this adds checks for the prodded flag alongside the checks for pending exceptions. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)