| Message ID | 20170718014926.44781-2-bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:49:25 +0200 Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Jing Zhang <bjzhjing@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > When allocating memory for the vfio_irq_info parameter of the > VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO ioctl, we used the wrong size. Let's > fix it by using the right size. > > Reviewed-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <bjzhjing@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > hw/vfio/ccw.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c > index 12d0262336..8d97b53e77 100644 > --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c > +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c > @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_register_io_notifier(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev, Error **errp) > return; > } > > - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set); > + argsz = sizeof(*irq_info); > irq_info = g_malloc0(argsz); > irq_info->index = VFIO_CCW_IO_IRQ_INDEX; > irq_info->argsz = argsz; irq_set is larger than irq_info, but yes, let's do this correctly. Out of curiosity, how did you spot this?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:49:43 +0800 Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > * Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> [2017-07-18 10:32:13 +0200]: > > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 03:49:25 +0200 > > Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > From: Jing Zhang <bjzhjing@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > > > When allocating memory for the vfio_irq_info parameter of the > > > VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO ioctl, we used the wrong size. Let's > > > fix it by using the right size. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <bjzhjing@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > --- > > > hw/vfio/ccw.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c > > > index 12d0262336..8d97b53e77 100644 > > > --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c > > > +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c > > > @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_register_io_notifier(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev, Error **errp) > > > return; > > > } > > > > > > - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set); > > > + argsz = sizeof(*irq_info); > > > irq_info = g_malloc0(argsz); > > > irq_info->index = VFIO_CCW_IO_IRQ_INDEX; > > > irq_info->argsz = argsz; > > > > irq_set is larger than irq_info, but yes, let's do this correctly. > > > > Out of curiosity, how did you spot this? > > > > I'm trying to reuse the code here, while introducing some new MMIO > regions, which you will see them some days later. ;> > Looking forward to that :)
diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c index 12d0262336..8d97b53e77 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_register_io_notifier(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev, Error **errp) return; } - argsz = sizeof(*irq_set); + argsz = sizeof(*irq_info); irq_info = g_malloc0(argsz); irq_info->index = VFIO_CCW_IO_IRQ_INDEX; irq_info->argsz = argsz;