@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ extern int vsnprintf(char *buf, int size, const char *fmt, va_list va)
extern int vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list va)
__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 0)));
+extern void report_register_stamp(char * (*func)(void));
void report_prefix_pushf(const char *prefix_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)));
extern void report_prefix_push(const char *prefix);
@@ -16,9 +16,17 @@
static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
static char prefixes[256];
static struct spinlock lock;
+static char * (*stamp_func)(void);
#define PREFIX_DELIMITER ": "
+void report_register_stamp(char * (*func)(void))
+{
+ spin_lock(&lock);
+ stamp_func = func;
+ spin_unlock(&lock);
+}
+
void report_pass(void)
{
spin_lock(&lock);
@@ -90,6 +98,8 @@ static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
spin_lock(&lock);
tests++;
+ if (stamp_func)
+ printf("%s ", stamp_func());
printf("%s: ", prefix);
puts(prefixes);
vprintf(msg_fmt, va);
Lets add a function to get stamps for our reports. It'll help with finding the test case that was causing problems in dumps. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> --- I know this should be a common discussion and it will be later. But first I want to get a few opinions here, especially about how to wire that up. Using ifdefs? Enabling via argv? My current plan for s390 is to register a wrapper of time_get_ns() that prints "[%ld]" as the stamp prefix. As other archs might have other values or might want to include the cpu# I kept it as generic as possible. --- lib/libcflat.h | 1 + lib/report.c | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)