From patchwork Wed May 15 10:54:55 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 10944613 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB59D76 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EEB289BC for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id BD7DD289EB; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B784289BC for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729540AbfEOMG6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 08:06:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43004 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728876AbfEOLJq (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 07:09:46 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3197B2084F; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:09:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557918584; bh=fvQ7HN3G+WGKBDG2GyZKRvmrZ2b7KtUSJBPqQj+sA30=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f8/BIk70BGRcBgtBC5QmuY5nVFMncY5iiL9u3skPup5+IvWBYCy5D3+B4O0F30H5J xmXF9XtjOlTj9NlcP8tttMX0Yd/qav3/AyglLDEetUWeDYXbp9S7L+GYGZ9vM68ut/ UnRssiI78+JaRPatKBV3HTf4nQiibd3cdKE677lM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Thomas Gleixner , Tom Lendacky , Janakarajan Natarajan , kvm@vger.kernel.org, KarimAllah Ahmed , andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Joerg Roedel , =?utf-8?b?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Borislav Petkov , David Woodhouse , Kees Cook , Ben Hutchings Subject: [PATCH 4.4 188/266] x86/bugs: Add AMDs SPEC_CTRL MSR usage Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:54:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20190515090729.297898045@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190515090722.696531131@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190515090722.696531131@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk commit 6ac2f49edb1ef5446089c7c660017732886d62d6 upstream. The AMD document outlining the SSBD handling 124441_AMD64_SpeculativeStoreBypassDisable_Whitepaper_final.pdf mentions that if CPUID 8000_0008.EBX[24] is set we should be using the SPEC_CTRL MSR (0x48) over the VIRT SPEC_CTRL MSR (0xC001_011f) for speculative store bypass disable. This in effect means we should clear the X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SSBD flag so that we would prefer the SPEC_CTRL MSR. See the document titled: 124441_AMD64_SpeculativeStoreBypassDisable_Whitepaper_final.pdf A copy of this document is available at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199889 Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tom Lendacky Cc: Janakarajan Natarajan Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: KarimAllah Ahmed Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com Cc: Joerg Roedel Cc: Radim Krčmář Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Kees Cook Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180601145921.9500-3-konrad.wilk@oracle.com [bwh: Backported to 4.4: - Update feature test in guest_cpuid_has_spec_ctrl() instead of svm_{get,set}_msr() - Adjust context, indentation] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 12 +++++++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 6 ++++++ arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 10 ++++++++-- arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB (13*32+12) /* "" Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier */ #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS (13*32+14) /* "" Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation */ #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP (13*32+15) /* "" Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictors */ +#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD (13*32+24) /* "" Speculative Store Bypass Disable */ #define X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SSBD (13*32+25) /* Virtualized Speculative Store Bypass Disable */ #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSB_NO (13*32+26) /* "" Speculative Store Bypass is fixed in hardware. */ --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -523,18 +523,20 @@ static enum ssb_mitigation __init __ssb_ if (mode == SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_DISABLE) { setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_DISABLE); /* - * Intel uses the SPEC CTRL MSR Bit(2) for this, while AMD uses - * a completely different MSR and bit dependent on family. + * Intel uses the SPEC CTRL MSR Bit(2) for this, while AMD may + * use a completely different MSR and bit dependent on family. */ switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) { case X86_VENDOR_INTEL: + case X86_VENDOR_AMD: + if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL)) { + x86_amd_ssb_disable(); + break; + } x86_spec_ctrl_base |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD; x86_spec_ctrl_mask |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD; wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base); break; - case X86_VENDOR_AMD: - x86_amd_ssb_disable(); - break; } } --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -709,6 +709,12 @@ static void init_speculation_control(str set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_STIBP); set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL); } + + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD)) { + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_SSBD); + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL); + clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SSBD); + } } void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c @@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct /* cpuid 0x80000008.ebx */ const u32 kvm_cpuid_8000_0008_ebx_x86_features = - F(AMD_IBPB) | F(AMD_IBRS) | F(VIRT_SSBD) | F(AMD_SSB_NO); + F(AMD_IBPB) | F(AMD_IBRS) | F(AMD_SSBD) | F(VIRT_SSBD) | + F(AMD_SSB_NO); /* cpuid 0xC0000001.edx */ const u32 kvm_supported_word5_x86_features = @@ -607,7 +608,12 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct entry->ebx |= F(VIRT_SSBD); entry->ebx &= kvm_cpuid_8000_0008_ebx_x86_features; cpuid_mask(&entry->ebx, CPUID_8000_0008_EBX); - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LS_CFG_SSBD)) + /* + * The preference is to use SPEC CTRL MSR instead of the + * VIRT_SPEC MSR. + */ + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LS_CFG_SSBD) && + !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD)) entry->ebx |= F(VIRT_SSBD); break; } --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_spec_ struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best; best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x80000008, 0); - if (best && (best->ebx & bit(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS))) + if (best && (best->ebx & (bit(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS | bit(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))))) return true; best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 7, 0); return best && (best->edx & (bit(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) | bit(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD))); --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -3197,7 +3197,7 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu * return 1; /* The STIBP bit doesn't fault even if it's not advertised */ - if (data & ~(SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP)) + if (data & ~(SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP | SPEC_CTRL_SSBD)) return 1; svm->spec_ctrl = data;