From patchwork Thu May 23 10:34:49 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sudeep Holla X-Patchwork-Id: 10957325 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8307876 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 10:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2F927F82 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 10:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 5DD362845E; Thu, 23 May 2019 10:36:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9480328433 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 10:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730405AbfEWKf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 06:35:26 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43018 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730381AbfEWKf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 06:35:26 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9B9341; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F6473F718; Thu, 23 May 2019 03:35:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoffer Dall , Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Pouloze , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry Subject: [PATCH v2 02/15] dt-bindings: ARM SPE: highlight the need for PPI partitions on heterogeneous systems Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 11:34:49 +0100 Message-Id: <20190523103502.25925-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190523103502.25925-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20190523103502.25925-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP It's not entirely clear for the binding document that the only way to express ARM SPE affined to a subset of CPUs on a heterogeneous systems is through the use of PPI partitions available in the interrupt controller bindings. Let's make it clear. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spe-pmu.txt | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spe-pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spe-pmu.txt index 93372f2a7df9..4f4815800f6e 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spe-pmu.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spe-pmu.txt @@ -9,8 +9,9 @@ performance sample data using an in-memory trace buffer. "arm,statistical-profiling-extension-v1" - interrupts : Exactly 1 PPI must be listed. For heterogeneous systems where - SPE is only supported on a subset of the CPUs, please consult - the arm,gic-v3 binding for details on describing a PPI partition. + SPE is only supported on a subset of the CPUs, a PPI partition + described in the arm,gic-v3 binding must be used to describe + the set of CPUs this interrupt is affine to. ** Example: