From patchwork Fri Oct 11 12:39:54 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Marc Zyngier X-Patchwork-Id: 11185349 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE29717D4 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB46222C1 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:40:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570797619; bh=f7y34NJ4OjN/HPijbAoKP5rq4WJ84jAmxudXXpb3/PA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=OklDpp6jg/BQgdmU9kFSndwErXsaqtbCdnsDZqpnvSkIvAClx6Bm+KuCUIN5Oq0J9 O5B8izG7846/I004iK8jwN3AP7UtpPPOtHI5Tp4LnZolo/yDjXSw+G6jWEo+a5Z68v TcUSMKQDCXA+5Fsf5KKxD5KoVKe5i8nKjG8DVm8Y= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728157AbfJKMkT (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:40:19 -0400 Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org ([213.251.177.50]:58708 "EHLO inca-roads.misterjones.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728147AbfJKMkS (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:40:18 -0400 Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by cheepnis.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iIuDQ-00062U-LF; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:40:16 +0200 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , Andrew Murray Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: arm64: pmu: Reset sample period on overflow handling Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:39:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20191011123954.31378-5-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191011123954.31378-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20191011123954.31378-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, andrew.murray@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org The PMU emulation code uses the perf event sample period to trigger the overflow detection. This works fine for the *first* overflow handling, but results in a huge number of interrupts on the host, unrelated to the number of interrupts handled in the guest (a x20 factor is pretty common for the cycle counter). On a slow system (such as a SW model), this can result in the guest only making forward progress at a glacial pace. It turns out that the clue is in the name. The sample period is exactly that: a period. And once the an overflow has occured, the following period should be the full width of the associated counter, instead of whatever the guest had initially programed. Reset the sample period to the architected value in the overflow handler, which now results in a number of host interrupts that is much closer to the number of interrupts in the guest. Fixes: b02386eb7dac ("arm64: KVM: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray --- virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c index f291d4ac3519..8731dfeced8b 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -442,8 +443,25 @@ static void kvm_pmu_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct kvm_pmc *pmc = perf_event->overflow_handler_context; + struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = to_arm_pmu(perf_event->pmu); struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc); int idx = pmc->idx; + u64 period; + + cpu_pmu->pmu.stop(perf_event, PERF_EF_UPDATE); + + /* + * Reset the sample period to the architectural limit, + * i.e. the point where the counter overflows. + */ + period = -(local64_read(&perf_event->count)); + + if (!kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(vcpu, pmc->idx)) + period &= GENMASK(31, 0); + + local64_set(&perf_event->hw.period_left, 0); + perf_event->attr.sample_period = period; + perf_event->hw.sample_period = period; __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= BIT(idx); @@ -451,6 +469,8 @@ static void kvm_pmu_perf_overflow(struct perf_event *perf_event, kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_IRQ_PENDING, vcpu); kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu); } + + cpu_pmu->pmu.start(perf_event, PERF_EF_RELOAD); } /**