From patchwork Tue Feb 4 07:13:28 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 11364129 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9490213A4 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DD52192A for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="XOiEoron" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726855AbgBDHNt (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 02:13:49 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:60072 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726479AbgBDHNt (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 02:13:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580800428; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6pE1yV5HBsGmICoUbkwNIntIfVP3d3daOMPPmOVPbEY=; b=XOiEoronLf0bK+zkE89PwmXZ9Pv03xsp0TS/wF0OKhlP87VyUlarhMGqzISmpUTGf0twAB 1g5BODYTE9VNTiijZjoqhDJ+d48NtdHBkzDQJ7iB+aUTtIvCRpK3pghgkFeyfb6hjt+J1q Rs77F0JHy97UYSBXnOo0FYCHZwKuRKU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-382-rKXpjoJOMK6yxPGTtKieWg-1; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 02:13:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: rKXpjoJOMK6yxPGTtKieWg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40DDA0CBF; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.com (ovpn-116-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9354C5C1D4; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:13:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini Cc: david@redhat.com, Janosch Frank Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PULL 2/9] s390x: smp: Fix ecall and emcall report strings Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 08:13:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20200204071335.18180-3-thuth@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200204071335.18180-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20200204071335.18180-1-thuth@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Janosch Frank Instead of "smp: ecall: ecall" we now get "smp: ecall: received". Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Message-Id: <20200201152851.82867-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- s390x/smp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c index e37eb56..93a9594 100644 --- a/s390x/smp.c +++ b/s390x/smp.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void ecall(void) load_psw_mask(mask); set_flag(1); while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1202) { mb(); } - report(1, "ecall"); + report(1, "received"); set_flag(1); } @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void emcall(void) load_psw_mask(mask); set_flag(1); while (lc->ext_int_code != 0x1201) { mb(); } - report(1, "ecall"); + report(1, "received"); set_flag(1); }