Message ID | 20200525094115.222299-1-cohuck@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > The following changes since commit 6a8b55ed4056ea5559ebe4f6a4b247f627870d4c: > > Linux 5.7-rc3 (2020-04-26 13:51:02 -0700) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw tags/vfio-ccw-20200525 Hello Conny, s390/features is based on v5.7-rc2 rather than on v5.7-rc3 as your tags/vfio-ccw-20200525. Are there any pre-requisites in between for vfio-ccw changes? It does cleanly rebase onto v5.7-rc2. Could you please rebase onto v5.7-rc2 or s390/features if that's possible? Thank you.
On Thu, 28 May 2020 14:42:31 +0200 Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > The following changes since commit 6a8b55ed4056ea5559ebe4f6a4b247f627870d4c: > > > > Linux 5.7-rc3 (2020-04-26 13:51:02 -0700) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw tags/vfio-ccw-20200525 > > Hello Conny, > > s390/features is based on v5.7-rc2 rather than on v5.7-rc3 as your > tags/vfio-ccw-20200525. Are there any pre-requisites in between for > vfio-ccw changes? It does cleanly rebase onto v5.7-rc2. There shouldn't be anything. > > Could you please rebase onto v5.7-rc2 or s390/features if that's possible? Ugh. Isn't there any way to avoid doing that?