From patchwork Thu Dec 17 02:56:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stephen Rothwell X-Patchwork-Id: 11979025 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3A0C1B0D8 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 02:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2084023406 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 02:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727620AbgLQC44 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:56:56 -0500 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:59597 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727115AbgLQC44 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:56:56 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CxGpg5JCjz9sRR; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:56:11 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1608173773; bh=0BUN17/xDSq7+CWgU8wi0dZDg7QZRtEzB1WlEheKggE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=TpWRTGPMExPzxK4g6VJFBkIPYYtyYT4sVp8ZeelQHmrO+qbYC7mvlB2fWDyd++g7k NQWfs75u66yPdiG8dTWmlqfSj0vmQt0SYH6dNZZXcUgiRjf03597lrr6HmScTzLG6b jdF8cQEPnVlA4XKrndHBSu1ozFroi5JlXplqHyM28V6SS4LsYV/W5s1NBqgiEGjpk/ knO6reWL99Zo6oC0EKRMc8QeZim3R0VLRrYw9YmvBB4jv2B2N+m3K3glziFJ/P97wz P/+M5WCjpv5ZW072G9zJ8x4Yv9s/l88nKMONdppCsMxrgivTukK2WXByGn0RMXBZ3n 9xmcNUdmuRO8g== Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:56:09 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Paolo Bonzini , KVM Cc: Chen Zhou , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Tom Lendacky Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20201217135609.6543533c@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in: arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c between commit: 054409ab253d ("KVM: SVM: fix error return code in svm_create_vcpu()") from Linus' tree and commit: add5e2f04541 ("KVM: SVM: Add support for the SEV-ES VMSA") from the kvm tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. diff --cc arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index da7eb4aaf44f,941e5251e13f..000000000000 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c