diff mbox series

[RFC,v7,16/22] virtio/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport

Message ID 20210323131406.2461651-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support | expand

Commit Message

Arseny Krasnov March 23, 2021, 1:14 p.m. UTC
This adds SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
callback.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

Comments

Stefano Garzarella March 25, 2021, 10:39 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:14:03PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This adds SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
>callback.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

Sorry for not mentioning this in the previous review, but maybe we can 
merge this patch with "virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support", so 
we have a single patch when we fully enable the SEQPACKET support in 
this transport.

Anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on that.

What do you think?

Stefano

>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c 
>b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>index 2700a63ab095..83ae2078c847 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>@@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> 	queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
> }
>
>+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void);
>+
> static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> 	.transport = {
> 		.module                   = THIS_MODULE,
>@@ -469,6 +471,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> 		.stream_is_active         = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> 		.stream_allow             = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
>
>+		.seqpacket_dequeue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
>+		.seqpacket_enqueue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
>+		.seqpacket_allow          = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow,
>+
> 		.notify_poll_in           = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> 		.notify_poll_out          = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> 		.notify_recv_init         = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
>@@ -483,8 +489,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> 	},
>
> 	.send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
>+	.seqpacket_allow = false
> };
>
>+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void)
>+{
>+	return virtio_transport.seqpacket_allow;
>+}
>+
> static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> 	struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
>-- 2.25.1
>
Arseny Krasnov March 25, 2021, 4:04 p.m. UTC | #2
On 25.03.2021 13:39, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:14:03PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
>> callback.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> Sorry for not mentioning this in the previous review, but maybe we can 
> merge this patch with "virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support", so 
> we have a single patch when we fully enable the SEQPACKET support in 
> this transport.
>
> Anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on that.
>
> What do you think?
Ok, no problem
>
> Stefano
>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c 
>> b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> index 2700a63ab095..83ae2078c847 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>> @@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
>> 	queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void);
>> +
>> static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
>> 	.transport = {
>> 		.module                   = THIS_MODULE,
>> @@ -469,6 +471,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
>> 		.stream_is_active         = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
>> 		.stream_allow             = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
>>
>> +		.seqpacket_dequeue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
>> +		.seqpacket_enqueue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
>> +		.seqpacket_allow          = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow,
>> +
>> 		.notify_poll_in           = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
>> 		.notify_poll_out          = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
>> 		.notify_recv_init         = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
>> @@ -483,8 +489,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
>> 	},
>>
>> 	.send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
>> +	.seqpacket_allow = false
>> };
>>
>> +static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void)
>> +{
>> +	return virtio_transport.seqpacket_allow;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> 	struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
>> -- 2.25.1
>>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index 2700a63ab095..83ae2078c847 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -443,6 +443,8 @@  static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
 	queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
 }
 
+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void);
+
 static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
 	.transport = {
 		.module                   = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -469,6 +471,10 @@  static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
 		.stream_is_active         = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
 		.stream_allow             = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
 
+		.seqpacket_dequeue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
+		.seqpacket_enqueue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
+		.seqpacket_allow          = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow,
+
 		.notify_poll_in           = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
 		.notify_poll_out          = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
 		.notify_recv_init         = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
@@ -483,8 +489,14 @@  static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
 	},
 
 	.send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
+	.seqpacket_allow = false
 };
 
+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void)
+{
+	return virtio_transport.seqpacket_allow;
+}
+
 static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct virtio_vsock *vsock =