From patchwork Wed May 12 15:09:45 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilias Stamatis X-Patchwork-Id: 12254097 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87596C43611 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 15:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5495A61C44 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 15:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233279AbhELPRv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 11:17:51 -0400 Received: from smtp-fw-4101.amazon.com ([72.21.198.25]:25570 "EHLO smtp-fw-4101.amazon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233820AbhELPPI (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2021 11:15:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1620832441; x=1652368441; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=uGO4mCIQH4xEGCcMeem8ddAwwkcjIQxlPW+s+OxhsrI=; b=HcElgUvq2Cgy4KyLhz8Dtqf6CIG4LcmI769gUfW+69bNvq/6URr7ouIX djZZbYHeuAIDT7vCYQsXxxf3bmDNVV/OaX/+ZjtcpVG1fQQ9InITSrhNu cwsV4aK5cCJIKWvTx0u778GzBy/1eZ9c5VpW6T0ic6uqITOiQPHaK4Qne c=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,293,1613433600"; d="scan'208";a="107340911" Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-1e-c7c08562.us-east-1.amazon.com) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-4101.iad4.amazon.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2021 15:13:51 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUEB001.ant.amazon.com (iad12-ws-svc-p26-lb9-vlan2.iad.amazon.com [10.40.163.34]) by email-inbound-relay-1e-c7c08562.us-east-1.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B0612402B9; Wed, 12 May 2021 15:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX13D08UEB003.ant.amazon.com (10.43.60.11) by EX13MTAUEB001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.60.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 12 May 2021 15:13:35 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUEB002.ant.amazon.com (10.43.60.12) by EX13D08UEB003.ant.amazon.com (10.43.60.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 12 May 2021 15:13:34 +0000 Received: from uae075a0dfd4c51.ant.amazon.com (10.106.82.24) by mail-relay.amazon.com (10.43.60.234) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 May 2021 15:13:32 +0000 From: Ilias Stamatis To: , , CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: selftests: x86: Add vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:09:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20210512150945.4591-11-ilstam@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210512150945.4591-1-ilstam@amazon.com> References: <20210512150945.4591-1-ilstam@amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Test that nested TSC scaling works as expected with both L1 and L2 scaled. Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + .../kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 244 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore index bd83158e0e0b..cc02022f9951 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ /x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test /x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test /x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test +/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test /x86_64/xapic_ipi_test /x86_64/xen_shinfo_test /x86_64/xen_vmcall_test diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index e439d027939d..1078240b1313 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_dirty_log_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/xapic_ipi_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/xss_msr_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/debug_regs diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f4a8f426281a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. + * + * This test case verifies that nested TSC scaling behaves as expected when + * both L1 and L2 are scaled using different ratios. For this test we scale + * L1 down and scale L2 up. + */ + +#include + +#include "kvm_util.h" +#include "vmx.h" +#include "kselftest.h" + + +#define VCPU_ID 0 + +/* L2 is scaled up (from L1's perspective) by this factor */ +#define L2_SCALE_FACTOR 4ULL + +#define TSC_OFFSET_L2 ((uint64_t) -33125236320908) +#define TSC_MULTIPLIER_L2 (L2_SCALE_FACTOR << 48) + +#define L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE 64 + +enum { USLEEP, UCHECK_L1, UCHECK_L2 }; +#define GUEST_SLEEP(sec) ucall(UCALL_SYNC, 2, USLEEP, sec) +#define GUEST_CHECK(level, freq) ucall(UCALL_SYNC, 2, level, freq) + + +/* + * This function checks whether the "actual" TSC frequency of a guest matches + * its expected frequency. In order to account for delays in taking the TSC + * measurements, a difference of 1% between the actual and the expected value + * is tolerated. + */ +static void compare_tsc_freq(uint64_t actual, uint64_t expected) +{ + uint64_t tolerance, thresh_low, thresh_high; + + tolerance = expected / 100; + thresh_low = expected - tolerance; + thresh_high = expected + tolerance; + + TEST_ASSERT(thresh_low < actual, + "TSC freq is expected to be between %"PRIu64" and %"PRIu64 + " but it actually is %"PRIu64, + thresh_low, thresh_high, actual); + TEST_ASSERT(thresh_high > actual, + "TSC freq is expected to be between %"PRIu64" and %"PRIu64 + " but it actually is %"PRIu64, + thresh_low, thresh_high, actual); +} + +static void check_tsc_freq(int level) +{ + uint64_t tsc_start, tsc_end, tsc_freq; + + /* + * Reading the TSC twice with about a second's difference should give + * us an approximation of the TSC frequency from the guest's + * perspective. Now, this won't be completely accurate, but it should + * be good enough for the purposes of this test. + */ + tsc_start = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC); + GUEST_SLEEP(1); + tsc_end = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC); + + tsc_freq = tsc_end - tsc_start; + + GUEST_CHECK(level, tsc_freq); +} + +static void l2_guest_code(void) +{ + check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L2); + + /* exit to L1 */ + __asm__ __volatile__("vmcall"); +} + +static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages) +{ + unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]; + uint32_t control; + + /* check that L1's frequency looks alright before launching L2 */ + check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L1); + + GUEST_ASSERT(prepare_for_vmx_operation(vmx_pages)); + GUEST_ASSERT(load_vmcs(vmx_pages)); + + /* prepare the VMCS for L2 execution */ + prepare_vmcs(vmx_pages, l2_guest_code, &l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]); + + /* enable TSC offsetting and TSC scaling for L2 */ + control = vmreadz(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL); + control |= CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS | CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING; + vmwrite(CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, control); + + control = vmreadz(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL); + control |= SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING; + vmwrite(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, control); + + vmwrite(TSC_OFFSET, TSC_OFFSET_L2); + vmwrite(TSC_MULTIPLIER, TSC_MULTIPLIER_L2); + vmwrite(TSC_MULTIPLIER_HIGH, TSC_MULTIPLIER_L2 >> 32); + + /* launch L2 */ + GUEST_ASSERT(!vmlaunch()); + GUEST_ASSERT(vmreadz(VM_EXIT_REASON) == EXIT_REASON_VMCALL); + + /* check that L1's frequency still looks good */ + check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L1); + + GUEST_DONE(); +} + +static void tsc_scaling_check_supported(void) +{ + if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_TSC_CONTROL)) { + print_skip("TSC scaling not supported by the HW"); + exit(KSFT_SKIP); + } +} + +static void stable_tsc_check_supported(void) +{ + FILE *fp; + char buf[4]; + + fp = fopen("/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource", "r"); + if (fp == NULL) + goto skip_test; + + if (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), fp) == NULL) + goto skip_test; + + if (strncmp(buf, "tsc", sizeof(buf))) + goto skip_test; + + return; +skip_test: + print_skip("TSC is not stable"); + exit(KSFT_SKIP); +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + struct kvm_vm *vm; + vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva; + + uint64_t tsc_start, tsc_end; + uint64_t tsc_khz; + uint64_t l1_scale_factor; + uint64_t l0_tsc_freq = 0; + uint64_t l1_tsc_freq = 0; + uint64_t l2_tsc_freq = 0; + + nested_vmx_check_supported(); + tsc_scaling_check_supported(); + stable_tsc_check_supported(); + + /* + * We set L1's scale factor to be a random number from 2 to 10. + * Ideally we would do the same for L2's factor but that one is + * referenced by both main() and l1_guest_code() and using a global + * variable does not work. + */ + srand(time(NULL)); + l1_scale_factor = (rand() % 9) + 2; + printf("L1's scale factor is: %"PRIu64"\n", l1_scale_factor); + printf("L2's scale factor is: %llu\n", L2_SCALE_FACTOR); + + tsc_start = rdtsc(); + sleep(1); + tsc_end = rdtsc(); + + l0_tsc_freq = tsc_end - tsc_start; + printf("real TSC frequency is around: %"PRIu64"\n", l0_tsc_freq); + + vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, (void *) l1_guest_code); + vcpu_alloc_vmx(vm, &vmx_pages_gva); + vcpu_args_set(vm, VCPU_ID, 1, vmx_pages_gva); + + tsc_khz = _vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_GET_TSC_KHZ, NULL); + TEST_ASSERT(tsc_khz != -1, "vcpu ioctl KVM_GET_TSC_KHZ failed"); + + /* scale down L1's TSC frequency */ + vcpu_ioctl(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ, + (void *) (tsc_khz / l1_scale_factor)); + + for (;;) { + volatile struct kvm_run *run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID); + struct ucall uc; + + vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID); + TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO, + "Got exit_reason other than KVM_EXIT_IO: %u (%s)\n", + run->exit_reason, + exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason)); + + switch (get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) { + case UCALL_ABORT: + TEST_FAIL("%s", (const char *) uc.args[0]); + case UCALL_SYNC: + switch (uc.args[0]) { + case USLEEP: + sleep(uc.args[1]); + break; + case UCHECK_L1: + l1_tsc_freq = uc.args[1]; + printf("L1's TSC frequency is around: %"PRIu64 + "\n", l1_tsc_freq); + + compare_tsc_freq(l1_tsc_freq, + l0_tsc_freq / l1_scale_factor); + break; + case UCHECK_L2: + l2_tsc_freq = uc.args[1]; + printf("L2's TSC frequency is around: %"PRIu64 + "\n", l2_tsc_freq); + + compare_tsc_freq(l2_tsc_freq, + l1_tsc_freq * L2_SCALE_FACTOR); + break; + } + break; + case UCALL_DONE: + goto done; + default: + TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd); + } + } + +done: + kvm_vm_free(vm); + return 0; +}