@@ -1953,7 +1953,7 @@ static long kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
static int gfn_to_memslot_approx(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
{
int start = 0, end = slots->used_slots;
- int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
+ int slot = atomic_read(&slots->last_used_slot);
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslots = slots->memslots;
if (gfn >= memslots[slot].base_gfn &&
@@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ static int gfn_to_memslot_approx(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
if (gfn >= memslots[start].base_gfn &&
gfn < memslots[start].base_gfn + memslots[start].npages) {
- atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, start);
+ atomic_set(&slots->last_used_slot, start);
}
return start;
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ struct kvm_memslots {
u64 generation;
/* The mapping table from slot id to the index in memslots[]. */
short id_to_index[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
- atomic_t lru_slot;
+ atomic_t last_used_slot;
int used_slots;
struct kvm_memory_slot memslots[];
};
@@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
{
int start = 0, end = slots->used_slots;
- int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
+ int slot = atomic_read(&slots->last_used_slot);
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslots = slots->memslots;
if (unlikely(!slots->used_slots))
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
if (start < slots->used_slots && gfn >= memslots[start].base_gfn &&
gfn < memslots[start].base_gfn + memslots[start].npages) {
- atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, start);
+ atomic_set(&slots->last_used_slot, start);
return &memslots[start];
}
@@ -1223,8 +1223,8 @@ static inline void kvm_memslot_delete(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
slots->used_slots--;
- if (atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot) >= slots->used_slots)
- atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, 0);
+ if (atomic_read(&slots->last_used_slot) >= slots->used_slots)
+ atomic_set(&slots->last_used_slot, 0);
for (i = slots->id_to_index[memslot->id]; i < slots->used_slots; i++) {
mslots[i] = mslots[i + 1];
lru_slot is used to keep track of the index of the most-recently used memslot. The correct acronym would be "mru" but that is not a common acronym. So call it last_used_slot which is a bit more obvious. Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> --- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 6 +++--- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)