diff mbox series

[kvm-unit-tests,v1,7/9] s390x: smp: add tests for CONDITIONAL EMERGENCY

Message ID 20220321101904.387640-8-nrb@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series s390x: Further extend instruction interception tests | expand

Commit Message

Nico Boehr March 21, 2022, 10:19 a.m. UTC
Add a test for the conditional emergency signal.

We cover the following cases:
- invalid CPU address. Should lead to the order being rejected.
- the order is accepted and an emergency signal is delivered. We make sure
  this is the case by disabling the CPU's PSW for IO interruptions.

Note we intentionally don't cover the case where the signal isn't
delivered. As per the PoP, implementations are allowed to make the signal
an unconditional one when the condition determination is precluded.

This test is unsupported under PV.

Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
 s390x/smp.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index 3bd7e7c8f5ed..9c4e27106aef 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ 
 #include <asm/sigp.h>
 
 #include <smp.h>
+#include <uv.h>
 #include <gs.h>
 #include <alloc_page.h>
 
@@ -604,6 +605,47 @@  static void test_emcall(void)
 	report_prefix_pop();
 }
 
+static void test_cond_emcall(void)
+{
+	uint32_t status = 0;
+	struct psw psw;
+	int cc;
+	psw.mask = extract_psw_mask() & ~PSW_MASK_IO;
+	psw.addr = (unsigned long)emcall;
+
+	report_prefix_push("conditional emergency call");
+
+	if (uv_os_is_guest()) {
+		report_skip("unsupported under PV");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	report_prefix_push("invalid CPU address");
+
+	cc = sigp(INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS, SIGP_COND_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, NULL);
+	report(cc == 3, "CC = 3");
+
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	report_prefix_push("success");
+	set_flag(0);
+
+	smp_cpu_start(1, psw);
+	wait_for_flag();
+	set_flag(0);
+	cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_COND_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL, 0, &status);
+	report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+
+	wait_for_flag();
+	smp_cpu_stop(1);
+
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+out:
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+}
+
 static void test_sense_running(void)
 {
 	report_prefix_push("sense_running");
@@ -731,6 +773,7 @@  int main(void)
 	test_set_prefix();
 	test_ecall();
 	test_emcall();
+	test_cond_emcall();
 	test_sense_running();
 	test_reset();
 	test_reset_initial();