Message ID | 20221117143242.102721-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | SVM: vNMI (with my fixes) | expand |
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c index b258d6988f5dde..43cc4a5d22e012 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c @@ -989,7 +989,6 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm) vmcb12->control.next_rip = vmcb02->control.next_rip; vmcb12->control.int_ctl = svm->nested.ctl.int_ctl; - vmcb12->control.tlb_ctl = svm->nested.ctl.tlb_ctl; vmcb12->control.event_inj = svm->nested.ctl.event_inj; vmcb12->control.event_inj_err = svm->nested.ctl.event_inj_err;
The CPU doesn't change TLB_CTL value as stated in the PRM (15.16.2): "The VMRUN instruction reads, but does not change, the value of the TLB_CONTROL field" Therefore the KVM shoudn't do that either. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)