From patchwork Wed Jan 18 20:31:08 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Anthony Krowiak X-Patchwork-Id: 13107068 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EF4C38147 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230196AbjARUcn (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:32:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37148 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230198AbjARUbm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:31:42 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05ABD5F3B5; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:31:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30IIaER0014142; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:21 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=+YxVYTXd8FjVV1zFFNPP5+lwoxTTu+Ov7bPEzx1bIag=; b=D6w/XFBwZeaUiubqS+DRCi2TB6CqIvs6EXVQr3Dmjs0G4fKktuHwNkvBITlaZm+QppyA Iu7xY3FqnbCwyRAi/DTGuMKsZBaAuNIYZfKrGvxBq6M97aztuI4HYE+FDEJCBRL9yLwv TTU8g4GHS1W+6Y+yJD0nnpPWH/Wixk+C6EU9+5laawHQzXe3s8hnGDmjpwGyYrmmUgyp tcDTGNW9FrlcOVOiyO8AyLdYByBwpBBKo/OZfi067VQvdc608rgSZKDrH9jMNTnDZdew 4gcHn9Ve2lgoZRP6jc9c0eC5zW8V53MrTZpenOlc6pLUJQou1I1fJJNJNQL9QPbW3Scl Aw== Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n6hvn9mnm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:21 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30IJdcN2024977; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:16 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.130.99]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n3m17quru-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:16 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.105]) by smtprelay07.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30IKVEKQ35913992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:15 GMT Received: from smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B946E58043; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC4B58059; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-2c1e724c-2c76-11b2-a85c-ae42eaf3cb3d.endicott.ibm.com (unknown [9.60.85.43]) by smtpav06.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:31:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Tony Krowiak To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, freude@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/vfio_ap: use TAPQ to verify reset in progress completes Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:31:08 -0500 Message-Id: <20230118203111.529766-4-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20230118203111.529766-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230118203111.529766-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: xRySWNIXIEBFdWl4UEpJbBc4_iYCbM8p X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xRySWNIXIEBFdWl4UEpJbBc4_iYCbM8p X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.923,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-18_05,2023-01-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301180173 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org To eliminate the repeated calls to the PQAP(ZAPQ) function to verify that a reset in progress completed successfully and ensure that error response codes get appropriately logged, let's call the apq_reset_check() function when the ZAPQ response code indicates that a reset that is already in progress. Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger --- drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c index b27daaaa79b4..a443ee5f7789 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct ap_queue_table *qtable); static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_find_queue(int apqn); static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_ap_matrix_dev_ops; -static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q, unsigned int retry); +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q); /** * get_update_locks_for_kvm: Acquire the locks required to dynamically update a @@ -1643,8 +1643,7 @@ static int apq_reset_check(struct vfio_ap_queue *q) return ret; } -static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q, - unsigned int retry) +static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q) { struct ap_queue_status status; int ret; @@ -1659,12 +1658,15 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q, ret = 0; break; case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS: - if (retry--) { - msleep(20); - goto retry_zapq; - } - ret = -EBUSY; - break; + /* + * There is a reset issued by another process in progress. Let's wait + * for that to complete. Since we have no idea whether it was a RAPQ or + * ZAPQ, then if it completes successfully, let's issue the ZAPQ. + */ + ret = apq_reset_check(q); + if (ret) + break; + goto retry_zapq; case AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL: case AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED: case AP_RESPONSE_CHECKSTOPPED: @@ -1699,7 +1701,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(struct ap_queue_table *qtable) struct vfio_ap_queue *q; hash_for_each(qtable->queues, loop_cursor, q, mdev_qnode) { - ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q, 1); + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q); /* * Regardless whether a queue turns out to be busy, or * is not operational, we need to continue resetting @@ -1944,7 +1946,7 @@ void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *apdev) } } - vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q, 1); + vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q); dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL); kfree(q); release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);