From patchwork Tue Apr 4 11:36:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nico Boehr X-Patchwork-Id: 13199642 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4244C761AF for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234992AbjDDLhV (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 07:37:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39320 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234847AbjDDLhH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 07:37:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E2630C5 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3349ka6B032990; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:57 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=htu18JeVPa7/z7Aj/NlsLMkqwzWQdS3VFbhEbHPmYk4=; b=tQl6YjbPK8oUAg6fRzDq+xLXCsNdO8ljnBLgmAP1RhjqmRmbqVcb8n97aDDrFQy5qNN8 V37ssNpxPMfu6gFb5+e575EqHEBsyvAKnp4NM4syF4DB6VJgRKOxpYY7LlQX+eSFit29 8RwQFku7eb5nvLKtPELvhigy7LySWpx90n9ByhZG4UsUZV7iKbPYBNslIDHN3yf2/s81 uJEpYtL11n+6LEvRX7qeKS6FjK5iYdrQKOmJGNRO+yRPr5xy2R+Kt5xvdOqOeFX63O+w hRpEsTO2zMhhmmFH6RTjD0rq4BrHqHsgjcp2oS52v9Fnpji9qWcihMRWlCICxTo+vzrX IQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3prhjd2k98-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:36:57 +0000 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3349uvXu034449; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:56 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3prhjd2k87-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:36:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 333Kc6LF015468; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ppc872fh0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 11:36:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 334BaoJt23659130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:50 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A308720040; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295302004B; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from t14-nrb.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.171.55.238]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 11:36:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Nico Boehr To: thuth@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch Subject: [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL v2 11/14] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 13:36:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20230404113639.37544-12-nrb@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230404113639.37544-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230404113639.37544-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: tXarOfd7VkHh0apm7fmjjO6_r6Mk6M26 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Y5DzngbNHWnWa6qff_U5cV5jeOZYUWaC X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-04-04_04,2023-04-04_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2304040107 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch Test the instruction address used by targets of an execute instruction. When the target instruction calculates a relative address, the result is relative to the target instruction, not the execute instruction. Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230317112339.774659-1-nsg@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr --- s390x/Makefile | 1 + s390x/ex.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ s390x/unittests.cfg | 3 + .gitlab-ci.yml | 1 + 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+) create mode 100644 s390x/ex.c diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile index ab146eb..a80db53 100644 --- a/s390x/Makefile +++ b/s390x/Makefile @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-extint.elf tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-pgm.elf tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-sck.elf tests += $(TEST_DIR)/exittime.elf +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/ex.elf pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf diff --git a/s390x/ex.c b/s390x/ex.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dbd8030 --- /dev/null +++ b/s390x/ex.c @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2023 + * + * Test EXECUTE (RELATIVE LONG). + * These instructions execute a target instruction. The target instruction is formed + * by reading an instruction from memory and optionally modifying some of its bits. + * The execution of the target instruction is the same as if it was executed + * normally as part of the instruction sequence, except for the instruction + * address and the instruction-length code. + */ + +#include + +/* + * Accesses to the operand of execute-type instructions are instruction fetches. + * Minimum alignment is two, since the relative offset is specified by number of halfwords. + */ +asm ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets,\"x\"\n" +" .balign 2\n" +" .popsection\n" +); + +/* + * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant. + * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction) + * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is + * specified as target. + * BASR does *not* perform a relative address calculation with an intermediate. + */ +static void test_basr(void) +{ + uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex; + + report_prefix_push("BASR"); + asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n" + "0: basr %[ret_addr],0\n" + " .popsection\n" + + " larl %[after_ex],1f\n" + " exrl 0,0b\n" + "1:\n" + : [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr), + [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex) + ); + + report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX"); + report_prefix_pop(); +} + +/* + * BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE. + * According to PoP (Branch-Address Generation), the address calculated relative + * to the instruction address is relative to BRAS when it is the target of an + * execute-type instruction, not relative to the execute-type instruction. + */ +static void test_bras(void) +{ + uint64_t after_target, ret_addr, after_ex, branch_addr; + + report_prefix_push("BRAS"); + asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n" + "0: bras %[ret_addr],1f\n" + " nopr %%r7\n" + "1: larl %[branch_addr],0\n" + " j 4f\n" + " .popsection\n" + + " larl %[after_target],1b\n" + " larl %[after_ex],3f\n" + "2: exrl 0,0b\n" +/* + * In case the address calculation is correct, we jump by the relative offset 1b-0b from 0b to 1b. + * In case the address calculation is relative to the exrl (i.e. a test failure), + * put a valid instruction at the same relative offset from the exrl, so the test continues in a + * controlled manner. + */ + "3: larl %[branch_addr],0\n" + "4:\n" + + " .if (1b - 0b) != (3b - 2b)\n" + " .error \"right and wrong target must have same offset\"\n" + " .endif\n" + : [after_target] "=d" (after_target), + [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr), + [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex), + [branch_addr] "=d" (branch_addr) + ); + + report(after_target == branch_addr, "address calculated relative to BRAS"); + report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX"); + report_prefix_pop(); +} + +/* + * LOAD ADDRESS RELATIVE LONG. + * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative + * to the LARL. + */ +static void test_larl(void) +{ + uint64_t target, addr; + + report_prefix_push("LARL"); + asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n" + "0: larl %[addr],0\n" + " .popsection\n" + + " larl %[target],0b\n" + " exrl 0,0b\n" + : [target] "=d" (target), + [addr] "=d" (addr) + ); + + report(target == addr, "address calculated relative to LARL"); + report_prefix_pop(); +} + +/* LOAD LOGICAL RELATIVE LONG. + * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative + * to the LLGFRL. + */ +static void test_llgfrl(void) +{ + uint64_t target, value; + + report_prefix_push("LLGFRL"); + asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n" + " .balign 4\n" + //operand of llgfrl must be word aligned + "0: llgfrl %[value],0\n" + " .popsection\n" + + " llgfrl %[target],0b\n" + //align (pad with nop), in case the wrong operand is used + " .balignw 4,0x0707\n" + " exrl 0,0b\n" + : [target] "=d" (target), + [value] "=d" (value) + ); + + report(target == value, "loaded correct value"); + report_prefix_pop(); +} + +/* + * COMPARE RELATIVE LONG + * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative + * to the CRL. + */ +static void test_crl(void) +{ + uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word; + + report_prefix_push("CRL"); + asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n" + //operand of crl must be word aligned + " .balign 4\n" + "0: crl %[crl_word],0\n" + " .popsection\n" + + " lrl %[crl_word],0b\n" + //align (pad with nop), in case the wrong operand is used + " .balignw 4,0x0707\n" + " exrl 0,0b\n" + " ipm %[program_mask]\n" + : [program_mask] "=d" (program_mask), + [crl_word] "=d" (crl_word) + :: "cc" + ); + + cc = program_mask >> 28; + report(!cc, "operand compared to is relative to CRL"); + report_prefix_pop(); +} + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + report_prefix_push("ex"); + test_basr(); + test_bras(); + test_larl(); + test_llgfrl(); + test_crl(); + report_prefix_pop(); + + return report_summary(); +} diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg index d97eb5e..b61faf0 100644 --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg @@ -215,3 +215,6 @@ file = migration-skey.elf smp = 2 groups = migration extra_params = -append '--parallel' + +[execute] +file = ex.elf diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml index ad7949c..a999f64 100644 --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ s390x-kvm: - ACCEL=kvm ./run_tests.sh selftest-setup intercept emulator sieve sthyi diag10 diag308 pfmf cmm vector gs iep cpumodel diag288 stsi sclp-1g sclp-3g css skrf sie + execute | tee results.txt - grep -q PASS results.txt && ! grep -q FAIL results.txt only: