Message ID | 20230727122053.774473-3-seiden@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: s390: Enable AP instructions for pv-guests | expand |
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 14:20:52 +0200 Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Add a uv_feature list for pv-guests to the kvm cpu-model. > The feature bits 'AP-interpretation for secure guests' and > 'AP-interrupt for secure guests' are available. > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com> > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 + > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 24 +++++++++++ > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 2bbc3d54959d..7ae57ac352b2 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -817,6 +817,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_cpu_model { > __u64 *fac_list; > u64 cpuid; > unsigned short ibc; > + /* subset of available uv features for pv-guests enabled by user space */ > + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat uv_feat_guest; > }; > > typedef int (*crypto_hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > index a73cf01a1606..7ea7e4fbd37e 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -159,6 +159,30 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc { > __u8 reserved[1728]; > }; > > +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST 6 > +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_UV_FEAT_GUEST 7 > + > +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_NR_BITS 64 > +struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat { > + union { > + struct { > + __u64 res0 : 4; > + __u64 ap : 1; /* bit 4 */ > + __u64 ap_intr : 1; /* bit 5 */ I would put padding here for completeness, and maybe a static assert for the size of struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat > + }; > + __u64 feat; > + }; > +}; > + > +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_MASK \ > +(((struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat) { \ > + .ap = 1, \ > + .ap_intr = 1, \ > +}).feat) please indent the body of the macro, and add tabs on the right so that the \ are aligned > + > +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_DEFAULT \ > +((struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat) { }) please indent the body of the macro > + > /* kvm attributes for crypto */ > #define KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_AES_KW 0 > #define KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_DEA_KW 1 > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index 339e3190f6dc..50c8b85b89ac 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -1531,6 +1531,32 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, > return 0; > } > > +static int kvm_s390_set_uv_feat(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > +{ > + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat data = {}; > + unsigned long filter = > + uv_info.uv_feature_indications & I think this can go in the previous line? > + (unsigned long)KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_MASK; the cast is not necessary without the cast the whole thing can fit in one line > + > + if (copy_from_user(&data, (void __user *)attr->addr, sizeof(data))) > + return -EFAULT; > + if (!bitmap_subset((unsigned long *)&data, &filter, > + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_NR_BITS)) this also fits in one line :) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > + if (kvm->created_vcpus) { > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > + return -EBUSY; > + } > + kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest = data; > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > + > + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "SET: guest uv feat: 0x%16.16llx", data.feat); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int kvm_s390_set_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > { > int ret = -ENXIO; > @@ -1545,6 +1571,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_SUBFUNC: > ret = kvm_s390_set_processor_subfunc(kvm, attr); > break; > + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST: > + ret = kvm_s390_set_uv_feat(kvm, attr); > + break; > } > return ret; > } > @@ -1777,6 +1806,37 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, > return 0; > } > > +static int kvm_s390_get_processor_uv_feat(struct kvm *kvm, > + struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > +{ > + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat *src = &kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest; > + > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, src, sizeof(*src))) > + return -EFAULT; > + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: guest uv feat: 0x%16.16llx", > + kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest.feat); this can actually fit in one line > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int kvm_s390_get_machine_uv_feat(struct kvm *kvm, > + struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > +{ > + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat data = { > + .feat = uv_info.uv_feature_indications & > + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_MASK this can fit in one line > + }; > + > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat) != > + sizeof(uv_info.uv_feature_indications)); > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, &data, > + sizeof(struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat))) why not sizeof(data) ? (also, it can fit in one line) > + return -EFAULT; > + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: guest uv feat: 0x%16.16llx", data.feat); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int kvm_s390_get_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > { > int ret = -ENXIO; > @@ -1800,6 +1860,12 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC: > ret = kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(kvm, attr); > break; > + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST: > + ret = kvm_s390_get_processor_uv_feat(kvm, attr); > + break; > + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_UV_FEAT_GUEST: > + ret = kvm_s390_get_machine_uv_feat(kvm, attr); > + break; > } > return ret; > } > @@ -1952,6 +2018,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) > case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_FEAT: > case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC: > case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_SUBFUNC: > + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_UV_FEAT_GUEST: > + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST: > ret = 0; > break; > default: > @@ -3292,6 +3360,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type) > kvm->arch.model.cpuid = kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(); > kvm->arch.model.ibc = sclp.ibc & 0x0fff; > > + kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_DEFAULT; > + > kvm_s390_crypto_init(kvm); > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM)) {
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 2bbc3d54959d..7ae57ac352b2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -817,6 +817,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_cpu_model { __u64 *fac_list; u64 cpuid; unsigned short ibc; + /* subset of available uv features for pv-guests enabled by user space */ + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat uv_feat_guest; }; typedef int (*crypto_hook)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h index a73cf01a1606..7ea7e4fbd37e 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h @@ -159,6 +159,30 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc { __u8 reserved[1728]; }; +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST 6 +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_UV_FEAT_GUEST 7 + +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_NR_BITS 64 +struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat { + union { + struct { + __u64 res0 : 4; + __u64 ap : 1; /* bit 4 */ + __u64 ap_intr : 1; /* bit 5 */ + }; + __u64 feat; + }; +}; + +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_MASK \ +(((struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat) { \ + .ap = 1, \ + .ap_intr = 1, \ +}).feat) + +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_DEFAULT \ +((struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat) { }) + /* kvm attributes for crypto */ #define KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_AES_KW 0 #define KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_DEA_KW 1 diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c index 339e3190f6dc..50c8b85b89ac 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c @@ -1531,6 +1531,32 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, return 0; } +static int kvm_s390_set_uv_feat(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) +{ + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat data = {}; + unsigned long filter = + uv_info.uv_feature_indications & + (unsigned long)KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_MASK; + + if (copy_from_user(&data, (void __user *)attr->addr, sizeof(data))) + return -EFAULT; + if (!bitmap_subset((unsigned long *)&data, &filter, + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_NR_BITS)) + return -EINVAL; + + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + if (kvm->created_vcpus) { + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + return -EBUSY; + } + kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest = data; + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "SET: guest uv feat: 0x%16.16llx", data.feat); + + return 0; +} + static int kvm_s390_set_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { int ret = -ENXIO; @@ -1545,6 +1571,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_SUBFUNC: ret = kvm_s390_set_processor_subfunc(kvm, attr); break; + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST: + ret = kvm_s390_set_uv_feat(kvm, attr); + break; } return ret; } @@ -1777,6 +1806,37 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(struct kvm *kvm, return 0; } +static int kvm_s390_get_processor_uv_feat(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_device_attr *attr) +{ + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat *src = &kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest; + + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, src, sizeof(*src))) + return -EFAULT; + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: guest uv feat: 0x%16.16llx", + kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest.feat); + + return 0; +} + +static int kvm_s390_get_machine_uv_feat(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_device_attr *attr) +{ + struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat data = { + .feat = uv_info.uv_feature_indications & + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_MASK + }; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat) != + sizeof(uv_info.uv_feature_indications)); + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, &data, + sizeof(struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_uv_feat))) + return -EFAULT; + VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "GET: guest uv feat: 0x%16.16llx", data.feat); + + return 0; +} + static int kvm_s390_get_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { int ret = -ENXIO; @@ -1800,6 +1860,12 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_cpu_model(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC: ret = kvm_s390_get_machine_subfunc(kvm, attr); break; + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST: + ret = kvm_s390_get_processor_uv_feat(kvm, attr); + break; + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_UV_FEAT_GUEST: + ret = kvm_s390_get_machine_uv_feat(kvm, attr); + break; } return ret; } @@ -1952,6 +2018,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_FEAT: case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_SUBFUNC: case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_SUBFUNC: + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE_UV_FEAT_GUEST: + case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR_UV_FEAT_GUEST: ret = 0; break; default: @@ -3292,6 +3360,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type) kvm->arch.model.cpuid = kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(); kvm->arch.model.ibc = sclp.ibc & 0x0fff; + kvm->arch.model.uv_feat_guest = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_UV_FEAT_GUEST_DEFAULT; + kvm_s390_crypto_init(kvm); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM)) {
Add a uv_feature list for pv-guests to the kvm cpu-model. The feature bits 'AP-interpretation for secure guests' and 'AP-interrupt for secure guests' are available. Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 + arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 24 +++++++++++ arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+)