@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* Request and verify all valid register sets. */
/* TODO: BUILD TIME CHECK: TEST_ASSERT(KVM_SYNC_X86_NUM_FIELDS != 3); */
run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
- rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, ®s);
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_X86_REGS | KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS;
- rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBAD1DEA + 1,
"rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xDEADBEEF;
- rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx != 0xDEADBEEF,
"rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xAAAA;
regs.rbx = 0xBAC0;
vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, ®s);
- rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xAAAA,
"rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
run->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
run->kvm_dirty_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBBBB;
- rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBBBB,
"rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
In the spots where we are expecting a successful run, we should use vcpu_run() instead of _vcpu_run() to make sure that the run did not fail. Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)