From patchwork Tue Oct 24 09:03:18 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13434101 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6E3C07545 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234119AbjJXIyg (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 04:54:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42218 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234131AbjJXIyP (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 04:54:15 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9580211F for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698137627; x=1729673627; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2cHMC5a5BJRlD/PsC4aspwTroLUP40TmuAMHURKso6g=; b=QkhSnu+bmEOHlOW+IwnG9ttuaDjz13fA791TkI1xQOFJeDhJ0r3F7uBZ 1RgHNPTzuNRlXS38kIdYUgcBd7Z7SycKz5ScZf0EJFS7RnQIN0IQch8u4 fMbFs4jL9GgpA6h9ZVIh2SR8iLgOmCIvlT0WDdBzyFMSnIPyg1kSrdAUh Dw9wUf0x1rtIUlGQQK8iSdfdx85dJ62yA4XeSRfrOK2n8Fc8Em/sA+gHu k3sazg2N2Ob/ldj0dVqEzlQQXQdLf3y2dqvpwZgAsBERAwKF6fB/h54hs 3VKSy62/xaMyiT4CFhD7v89KYbmqOI/J9uXt9YDL+62jgzF43bjN5s/ub Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10872"; a="5638582" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,247,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="5638582" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2023 01:53:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10872"; a="793418298" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,247,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="793418298" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2023 01:53:37 -0700 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-D?= =?utf-8?q?aud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Xiaoyao Li , Babu Moger , Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu , Zhuocheng Ding Subject: [PATCH v5 15/20] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:03:18 +0800 Message-Id: <20231024090323.1859210-16-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20231024090323.1859210-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20231024090323.1859210-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Zhuocheng Ding After i386 supports module level, it's time to add the test for module level's parsing. Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang Tested-by: Babu Moger Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c index f21b8a5d95c2..55b731ccae55 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; @@ -74,13 +75,22 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 33, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 6); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 7, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 8, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 9, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 4); + + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 1); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); /* build a weird topology and see if IDs are calculated correctly @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 6, 3}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_offset(&topo_info), ==, 2); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5);