From patchwork Fri Nov 17 07:51:01 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13458441 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LOKDZnit" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7100BD57 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:40:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700206809; x=1731742809; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2cHMC5a5BJRlD/PsC4aspwTroLUP40TmuAMHURKso6g=; b=LOKDZnitHIXrlfx08NTYbLUZLhzMc6L3tJ8/N75zux5w7Ok+9YhL7AQO Okl/MDkGhO6UrfuiIe0OeJVq//SzdtyKFPFE2fAjHokPHlzPBE7D5a6Ew +99OyqQ2D/QyOnbwXiMHwqGNcXWDAQVUvp6MCs9zNpUh0ZTpupqORRLXa 1uKGGwubqouebmONOvPE2/mU6qgVfj3zQlc/iXYl3+Qh7lQOK8G0ipdLo sjt83lZFuOZVmAPqJtLWCR7trf3dqLV4W59INp9W34p7RXSUdgSU7Tm7d 1aBt+GV4ola2hLTF4CmLIkIM8tBZYytjBcGkOY+z5DEipMPuZ7Fg+MM/z A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10896"; a="395180391" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,206,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="395180391" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2023 23:40:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10896"; a="883042813" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,206,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="883042813" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2023 23:40:01 -0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Zhuocheng Ding , Babu Moger , Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu , Yanan Wang Subject: [PATCH v6 11/16] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:51:01 +0800 Message-Id: <20231117075106.432499-12-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20231117075106.432499-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20231117075106.432499-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Zhuocheng Ding After i386 supports module level, it's time to add the test for module level's parsing. Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang Tested-by: Babu Moger Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c index f21b8a5d95c2..55b731ccae55 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; @@ -74,13 +75,22 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 33, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 6); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 7, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 8, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 9, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 4); + + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 1); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); /* build a weird topology and see if IDs are calculated correctly @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 6, 3}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_offset(&topo_info), ==, 2); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5);