Message ID | 20240420151741.962500-9-atishp@rivosinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V SBI v2.0 PMU improvements and Perf sampling in KVM guest | expand |
Hi Atish, On 2024-04-20 10:17 AM, Atish Patra wrote: > For RV32, used_hw_ctrs can have more than 1 word if the firmware chooses > to interleave firmware/hardware counters indicies. Even though it's a > unlikely scenario, handle that case by iterating over all the words > instead of just using the first word. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > --- > drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c > index f23501898657..4eacd89141a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c > @@ -652,10 +652,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) > static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) > { > struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events); > + int i; > > - /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */ > - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0, > - cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0); > + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) > + /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */ > + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, i * BITS_PER_LONG, > + cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i], 0, 0, 0, 0); > } > > /* > @@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) > static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, > unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask) > { > - int idx = 0; > + int idx = 0, i; > struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events); > struct perf_event *event; > unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE; > @@ -676,11 +678,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, > struct hw_perf_event *hwc; > u64 init_val = 0; > > - ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0] & ~ctr_ovf_mask; > - > - /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */ > - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask, > - 0, 0, 0, 0); > + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) { > + ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i] & ~ctr_ovf_mask; This is applying the mask for the first 32 logical counters to the both sets of 32 logical counters. ctr_ovf_mask needs to be 64 bits wide here, so each loop iteration can apply the correct half of the mask. Regards, Samuel > + /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */ > + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, i * BITS_PER_LONG, ctr_start_mask, > + 0, 0, 0, 0); > + } > > /* Reinitialize and start all the counter that overflowed */ > while (ctr_ovf_mask) {
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:37 PM Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> wrote: > > Hi Atish, > > On 2024-04-20 10:17 AM, Atish Patra wrote: > > For RV32, used_hw_ctrs can have more than 1 word if the firmware chooses > > to interleave firmware/hardware counters indicies. Even though it's a > > unlikely scenario, handle that case by iterating over all the words > > instead of just using the first word. > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > > --- > > drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c > > index f23501898657..4eacd89141a9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c > > +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c > > @@ -652,10 +652,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) > > static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) > > { > > struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events); > > + int i; > > > > - /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */ > > - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0, > > - cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0); > > + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) > > + /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */ > > + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, i * BITS_PER_LONG, > > + cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i], 0, 0, 0, 0); > > } > > > > /* > > @@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) > > static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, > > unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask) > > { > > - int idx = 0; > > + int idx = 0, i; > > struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events); > > struct perf_event *event; > > unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE; > > @@ -676,11 +678,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, > > struct hw_perf_event *hwc; > > u64 init_val = 0; > > > > - ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0] & ~ctr_ovf_mask; > > - > > - /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */ > > - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask, > > - 0, 0, 0, 0); > > + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) { > > + ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i] & ~ctr_ovf_mask; > > This is applying the mask for the first 32 logical counters to the both sets of > 32 logical counters. ctr_ovf_mask needs to be 64 bits wide here, so each loop > iteration can apply the correct half of the mask. > The 64bit wide support for ctr_ovf_mask is added in the next patch. > Regards, > Samuel > > > + /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */ > > + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, i * BITS_PER_LONG, ctr_start_mask, > > + 0, 0, 0, 0); > > + } > > > > /* Reinitialize and start all the counter that overflowed */ > > while (ctr_ovf_mask) { >
diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c index f23501898657..4eacd89141a9 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c @@ -652,10 +652,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_all(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) { struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events); + int i; - /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */ - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, 0, - cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0], 0, 0, 0, 0); + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) + /* No need to check the error here as we can't do anything about the error */ + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_STOP, i * BITS_PER_LONG, + cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i], 0, 0, 0, 0); } /* @@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_stop_hw_ctrs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu) static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, unsigned long ctr_ovf_mask) { - int idx = 0; + int idx = 0, i; struct cpu_hw_events *cpu_hw_evt = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->hw_events); struct perf_event *event; unsigned long flag = SBI_PMU_START_FLAG_SET_INIT_VALUE; @@ -676,11 +678,12 @@ static inline void pmu_sbi_start_overflow_mask(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct hw_perf_event *hwc; u64 init_val = 0; - ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[0] & ~ctr_ovf_mask; - - /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */ - sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, 0, ctr_start_mask, - 0, 0, 0, 0); + for (i = 0; i < BITS_TO_LONGS(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS); i++) { + ctr_start_mask = cpu_hw_evt->used_hw_ctrs[i] & ~ctr_ovf_mask; + /* Start all the counters that did not overflow in a single shot */ + sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_START, i * BITS_PER_LONG, ctr_start_mask, + 0, 0, 0, 0); + } /* Reinitialize and start all the counter that overflowed */ while (ctr_ovf_mask) {