diff mbox series

[v10,3/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test in pmu_event_filter_test

Message ID 20240619083200.1047073-4-shahuang@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test | expand

Commit Message

Shaoqin Huang June 19, 2024, 8:31 a.m. UTC 
Add the invalid filter test which sets the filter beyond the event
space and sets the invalid action to double check if the
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER will return the expected error.

Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
---
 .../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c       | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
index 308b8677e08e..1abbe6d8deb2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ 
  * This test checks if the guest only see the limited pmu event that userspace
  * sets, if the guest can use those events which user allow, and if the guest
  * can't use those events which user deny.
+ * It also checks that setting invalid filter ranges return the expected error.
  * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
  * is supported on the host.
  */
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@  struct vpmu_vm {
 
 static struct vpmu_vm vpmu_vm;
 
+#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_INVALID 3
 #define FILTER_NR 10
 
 struct test_desc {
@@ -181,6 +183,40 @@  static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
 	kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm.vm);
 }
 
+static void test_invalid_filter(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter invalid;
+	int ret;
+
+	pr_info("Test: test_invalid_filter\n");
+
+	memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
+
+	vpmu_vm.vm = vm_create(1);
+	vpmu_vm.vcpu = vm_vcpu_add_with_vpmu(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, guest_code);
+	vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64);
+	__TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm.gic_fd >= 0,
+		       "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping");
+
+	/* The max event number is (1 << 16), set a range largeer than it. */
+	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(BIT(15), BIT(15) + 1, KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW);
+	ret = __kvm_device_attr_set(vpmu_vm.vcpu->fd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+				    KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER, &invalid);
+	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter range "
+		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
+		    ret, errno);
+
+	/* Set the Invalid action. */
+	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(0, 1, KVM_PMU_EVENT_INVALID);
+	ret = __kvm_device_attr_set(vpmu_vm.vcpu->fd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+				    KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER, &invalid);
+	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter action "
+		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
+		    ret, errno);
+
+	destroy_vpmu_vm();
+}
+
 static void run_test(struct test_desc *t)
 {
 	pr_info("Test: %s\n", t->name);
@@ -311,4 +347,6 @@  int main(void)
 	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_pmu_support_events());
 
 	run_tests();
+
+	test_invalid_filter();
 }