@@ -107,6 +107,21 @@ static void ucall_abort(const char *assert_msg, const char *expected_assert_msg)
expected_assert_msg, &assert_msg[offset]);
}
+/*
+ * Open code vcpu_run(), sans the UCALL_ABORT handling, so that intentional
+ * guest asserts guest can be verified instead of being reported as failures.
+ */
+static void do_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int r;
+
+ do {
+ r = __vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ } while (r == -1 && errno == EINTR);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(!r, KVM_IOCTL_ERROR(KVM_RUN, r));
+}
+
static void run_test(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *expected_printf,
const char *expected_assert)
{
@@ -114,7 +129,7 @@ static void run_test(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *expected_printf,
struct ucall uc;
while (1) {
- vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ do_vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == UCALL_EXIT_REASON,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),",
@@ -159,7 +174,7 @@ static void test_limits(void)
vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code_limits);
run = vcpu->run;
- vcpu_run(vcpu);
+ do_vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == UCALL_EXIT_REASON,
"Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),",
Open code a version of vcpu_run() in the guest_printf test in anticipation of adding UCALL_ABORT handling to _vcpu_run(). The guest_printf test intentionally generates asserts to verify the output, and thus needs to bypass common assert handling. Open code a helper in the guest_printf test, as it's not expected that any other test would want to skip _only_ the UCALL_ABORT handling. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_print_test.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)