diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c index 2392a7ef254d..a34b49ea64b5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c @@ -231,11 +231,8 @@ static inline void nested_release_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu = to_hv_vcpu(vcpu); struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu); - if (nested_vmx_is_evmptr12_valid(vmx)) { - kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map, true); - vmx->nested.hv_evmcs = NULL; - } - + kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map, true); + vmx->nested.hv_evmcs = NULL; vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr = EVMPTR_INVALID; if (hv_vcpu) {
Remove the explicit evmptr12 validity check when deciding whether or not to unmap the eVMCS pointer, and instead rely on kvm_vcpu_unmap() to play nice with a NULL map->hva, i.e. to do nothing if the map is invalid. Note, vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_map is zero-allocated along with the rest of vcpu_vmx, i.e. the map starts out invalid/NULL. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)